FMS
Price
$22.81
Change
+$0.33 (+1.47%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
64 days until earnings call
USPH
Price
$91.31
Change
-$0.10 (-0.11%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
59 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FMS vs USPH

Header iconFMS vs USPH Comparison
Open Charts FMS vs USPHBanner chart's image
Fresenius Medical Care AG
Price$22.81
Change+$0.33 (+1.47%)
Volume$407.8K
CapitalizationN/A
US Physical Therapy
Price$91.31
Change-$0.10 (-0.11%)
Volume$252.74K
CapitalizationN/A
FMS vs USPH Comparison Chart
Loading...
FMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMS vs. USPH commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMS is a Hold and USPH is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (FMS: $22.81 vs. USPH: $91.31)
Brand notoriety: FMS and USPH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMS: 142% vs. USPH: 216%
Market capitalization -- FMS: $11.2B vs. USPH: $1.69B
FMS [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $11.2B. USPH’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $1.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSPH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USPH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, USPH is a better buy in the long-term than FMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USPH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • USPH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FMS and USPH are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -3.55% price change this week, while USPH (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -2.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -4.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMS is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.

USPH is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-4.34% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMS($11.2B) has a higher market cap than USPH($1.69B). USPH has higher P/E ratio than FMS: USPH (87.62) vs FMS (20.80). FMS YTD gains are higher at: 12.742 vs. USPH (-0.124). FMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.21B vs. USPH (74.4M). FMS has more cash in the bank: 1.54B vs. USPH (153M). USPH has less debt than FMS: USPH (259M) vs FMS (12.1B). FMS has higher revenues than USPH: FMS (19.5B) vs USPH (605M).
FMSUSPHFMS / USPH
Capitalization11.2B1.69B663%
EBITDA3.21B74.4M4,315%
Gain YTD12.742-0.124-10,301%
P/E Ratio20.8087.6224%
Revenue19.5B605M3,223%
Total Cash1.54B153M1,007%
Total Debt12.1B259M4,672%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMS vs USPH: Fundamental Ratings
FMS
USPH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5069
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8384
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4453
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8111
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMS's Valuation (11) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as USPH (34). This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to USPH’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as USPH (100). This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to USPH’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's SMR Rating (83) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as USPH (84). This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to USPH’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as USPH (53). This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to USPH’s over the last 12 months.

USPH's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMS (81). This means that USPH’s stock grew significantly faster than FMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMSUSPH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

FMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMS has been loosely correlated with DVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMS jumps, then DVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMS
1D Price
Change %
FMS100%
+1.47%
DVA - FMS
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.92%
UHS - FMS
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
HCSG - FMS
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
USPH - FMS
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
HCA - FMS
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
More

USPH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USPH has been loosely correlated with NHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USPH jumps, then NHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USPH
1D Price
Change %
USPH100%
-0.11%
NHC - USPH
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
SEM - USPH
47%
Loosely correlated
+4.38%
ENSG - USPH
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
THC - USPH
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
OPCH - USPH
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
More