FMS
Price
$27.16
Change
+$0.12 (+0.44%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
15.94B
17 days until earnings call
NAKA
Price
$0.72
Change
-$0.04 (-5.26%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
297.79M
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMS vs NAKA

Header iconFMS vs NAKA Comparison
Open Charts FMS vs NAKABanner chart's image
Fresenius Medical Care AG
Price$27.16
Change+$0.12 (+0.44%)
Volume$396.84K
Capitalization15.94B
Kindly MD
Price$0.72
Change-$0.04 (-5.26%)
Volume$12.72M
Capitalization297.79M
FMS vs NAKA Comparison Chart in %
FMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAKA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMS vs. NAKA commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMS is a Hold and NAKA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FMS: $27.16 vs. NAKA: $0.72)
Brand notoriety: FMS and NAKA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMS: 123% vs. NAKA: 64%
Market capitalization -- FMS: $15.94B vs. NAKA: $297.79M
FMS [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $15.94B. NAKA’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $297.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $99.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNAKA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NAKA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMS is a better buy in the long-term than NAKA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAKA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NAKA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMS is a better buy in the short-term than NAKA.

Price Growth

FMS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +1.27% price change this week, while NAKA (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -17.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

NAKA is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (+0.23% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMS($15.9B) has a higher market cap than NAKA($298M). FMS YTD gains are higher at: 23.274 vs. NAKA (-41.935). FMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.17B vs. NAKA (-5.19M). FMS has more cash in the bank: 1.72B vs. NAKA (6.03M). NAKA has less debt than FMS: NAKA (559K) vs FMS (11B). FMS has higher revenues than NAKA: FMS (19.5B) vs NAKA (2.24M).
FMSNAKAFMS / NAKA
Capitalization15.9B298M5,336%
EBITDA3.17B-5.19M-60,968%
Gain YTD23.274-41.935-55%
P/E Ratio20.92N/A-
Revenue19.5B2.24M870,536%
Total Cash1.72B6.03M28,465%
Total Debt11B559K1,967,800%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMS: Fundamental Ratings
FMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
19
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMSNAKA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NAKA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBBI10.95N/A
N/A
CBB Bancorp, Inc.
WRRZF0.25N/A
N/A
WALKER RIV RES CORP
SFGIF10.51N/A
N/A
SHIZUOKA FINL GROUP INC.
SILXF4.95-0.02
-0.40%
Silex Systems Ltd.
CRARY9.63-0.17
-1.73%
Credit Agricole SA

FMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMS has been loosely correlated with FSNUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMS jumps, then FSNUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMS
1D Price
Change %
FMS100%
+0.44%
FSNUY - FMS
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
DVA - FMS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
DNTCF - FMS
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.97%
OPCH - FMS
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.47%
CHE - FMS
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
More

NAKA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAKA and CCM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAKA and CCM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAKA
1D Price
Change %
NAKA100%
-4.89%
CCM - NAKA
22%
Poorly correlated
-9.39%
CCEL - NAKA
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
FMS - NAKA
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
UHS - NAKA
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
CON - NAKA
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More