It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCSG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCSG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -3.55% price change this week, while HCSG (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -9.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -4.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.65%.
FMS is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
HCSG is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
FMS | HCSG | FMS / HCSG | |
Capitalization | 11.2B | 918M | 1,220% |
EBITDA | 3.21B | 75.3M | 4,263% |
Gain YTD | 12.742 | 8.968 | 142% |
P/E Ratio | 20.80 | 24.02 | 87% |
Revenue | 19.5B | 1.67B | 1,167% |
Total Cash | 1.54B | 147M | 1,048% |
Total Debt | 12.1B | 36.2M | 33,425% |
FMS | HCSG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FMS's Valuation (11) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as HCSG (24) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to HCSG’s over the last 12 months.
FMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as HCSG (100) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to HCSG’s over the last 12 months.
HCSG's SMR Rating (66) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry is in the same range as FMS (83) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that HCSG’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.
FMS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as HCSG (50) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to HCSG’s over the last 12 months.
FMS's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as HCSG (85) in the Servicestothe Health Industry industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to HCSG’s over the last 12 months.
FMS | HCSG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago58% | 4 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago43% | 4 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago62% | 4 days ago70% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | 4 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago59% | 4 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago59% | 4 days ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago61% | 14 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago60% | 4 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago50% | 4 days ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago64% | 4 days ago65% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMS has been loosely correlated with DVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMS jumps, then DVA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FMS | 100% | +1.47% | ||
DVA - FMS | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.92% | ||
UHS - FMS | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.45% | ||
HCSG - FMS | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.22% | ||
USPH - FMS | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
HCA - FMS | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.05% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCSG has been loosely correlated with ENSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HCSG jumps, then ENSG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HCSG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HCSG | 100% | -1.22% | ||
ENSG - HCSG | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
BKD - HCSG | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.60% | ||
PNTG - HCSG | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
AVAH - HCSG | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
ASTH - HCSG | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.96% | ||
More |