It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
FMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -3.55% price change this week, while HCA (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -3.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -4.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.65%.
FMS is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
HCA is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
FMS | HCA | FMS / HCA | |
Capitalization | 11.2B | 88.2B | 13% |
EBITDA | 3.21B | 12.7B | 25% |
Gain YTD | 12.742 | 13.046 | 98% |
P/E Ratio | 20.80 | 17.40 | 120% |
Revenue | 19.5B | 65B | 30% |
Total Cash | 1.54B | 935M | 165% |
Total Debt | 12.1B | 41.9B | 29% |
FMS | HCA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HCA's Valuation (5) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as FMS (11) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that HCA’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.
HCA's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMS (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that HCA’s stock grew significantly faster than FMS’s over the last 12 months.
HCA's SMR Rating (44) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMS (83) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that HCA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMS’s over the last 12 months.
FMS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as HCA (62) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to HCA’s over the last 12 months.
HCA's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is in the same range as FMS (81) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that HCA’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.
FMS | HCA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago58% | 6 days ago74% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago43% | 4 days ago66% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago62% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | 4 days ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago59% | 4 days ago60% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago59% | 4 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago61% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago60% | 5 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago50% | 4 days ago82% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago64% | 4 days ago66% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMS has been loosely correlated with DVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMS jumps, then DVA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FMS | 100% | +1.47% | ||
DVA - FMS | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.92% | ||
UHS - FMS | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.45% | ||
HCSG - FMS | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.22% | ||
USPH - FMS | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
HCA - FMS | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.05% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCA has been closely correlated with UHS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCA jumps, then UHS could also see price increases.