Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMKFX vs RGACX
FMKFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FMKFX vs RGACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
FMKFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMKFX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMKFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FMKFX (352M). FMKFX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FMKFX (0.20) vs RGACX (0.07). FMKFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FMKFX (6 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FMKFX (0.45). FMKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FMKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FMKFX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. FMKFX (10.27). FMKFX return over 5 years is better than : 68.18 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| FMKFX | RGACX | FMKFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.94 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.94 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.422 | 14.044 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 352M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.07 | 270% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.27 | 14.08 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.87 | 41.19 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.18 | 41.95 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement