FMFG
Price
$16.25
Change
+$0.15 (+0.93%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
51.6M
NMBF
Price
$15.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
82.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMFG vs NMBF

Header iconFMFG vs NMBF Comparison
Open Charts FMFG vs NMBFBanner chart's image
Farmers and Merchants Bancshares
Price$16.25
Change+$0.15 (+0.93%)
Volume$550
Capitalization51.6M
NMB Finl
Price$15.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.15K
Capitalization82.17M
FMFG vs NMBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMFG vs. NMBF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMFG is a Hold and NMBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FMFG: $16.25 vs. NMBF: $15.75)
Brand notoriety: FMFG and NMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMFG: 60% vs. NMBF: 120%
Market capitalization -- FMFG: $51.6M vs. NMBF: $82.17M
FMFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $51.6M. NMBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $82.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNMBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FMFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMFG is a better buy in the long-term than NMBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMFG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMBF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NMBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMBF is a better buy in the short-term than FMFG.

Price Growth

FMFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NMBF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.15% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBF($82.2M) has a higher market cap than FMFG($51.6M). FMFG (11.86) and NMBF (11.50) have similar P/E ratio . NMBF YTD gains are higher at: 15.582 vs. FMFG (-19.055).
FMFGNMBFFMFG / NMBF
Capitalization51.6M82.2M63%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-19.05515.582-122%
P/E Ratio11.8611.50103%
Revenue23.2MN/A-
Total Cash21.8MN/A-
Total Debt20.4MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMFG vs NMBF: Fundamental Ratings
FMFG
NMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65100
SMR RATING
1..100
70100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3011
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6533

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMFG's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as NMBF (52). This means that FMFG’s stock grew similarly to NMBF’s over the last 12 months.

FMFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMBF (100). This means that FMFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMBF’s over the last 12 months.

FMFG's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as NMBF (100). This means that FMFG’s stock grew similarly to NMBF’s over the last 12 months.

NMBF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FMFG (60). This means that NMBF’s stock grew similarly to FMFG’s over the last 12 months.

NMBF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as FMFG (30). This means that NMBF’s stock grew similarly to FMFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMFGNMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMBBF42.231.07
+2.59%
Imperial Brands PLC
LVRLF0.06N/A
+1.96%
CordovaCann Corp.
MPGPF3.04N/A
N/A
PageGroup PLC
RTMNF1.49N/A
N/A
Reitmans (Canada) Limited
CUYTF44.10N/A
N/A
COLRUYT GROUP N.V.

FMFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMFG and COSO have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMFG and COSO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMFG
1D Price
Change %
FMFG100%
N/A
COSO - FMFG
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
NMBF - FMFG
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMCB - FMFG
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
FNRN - FMFG
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
FNFI - FMFG
4%
Poorly correlated
-7.78%
More

NMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMBF and BKFL have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMBF and BKFL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMBF
1D Price
Change %
NMBF100%
N/A
BKFL - NMBF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBSDY - NMBF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
LKSB - NMBF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SYBJF - NMBF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMFG - NMBF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More