Advertisement
FMET vs QCOM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMET is a Hold and QCOM is a Hold.
QCOM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FMET | QCOM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 9 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GDXD | 0.72 | 0.12 | +20.23% |
| MicroSectors™ Gold Mns 3X Inv Lvrgd ETN | |||
| FCAL | 49.29 | N/A | +0.01% |
| First Trust California Muni Hi Inc ETF | |||
| OASC | 28.20 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF | |||
| MYI | 11.00 | -0.06 | -0.54% |
| Blackrock Muniyield Quality Fund III | |||
| GLDM | 83.70 | -1.58 | -1.85% |
| SPDR® Gold MiniShares | |||
FMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMET has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMET jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMET | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| META - FMET | 75% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| AMD - FMET | 75% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| QCOM - FMET | 74% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| MPWR - FMET | 73% Closely correlated | -2.16% | ||
| NVDA - FMET | 73% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
More | ||||
QCOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCOM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCOM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| LRCX - QCOM | 80% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| KLAC - QCOM | 78% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| ADI - QCOM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| NXPI - QCOM | 76% Closely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| AMKR - QCOM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
More | ||||