FMELF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
8.53M
FSTTF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
7.49M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMELF vs FSTTF

Header iconFMELF vs FSTTF Comparison
Open Charts FMELF vs FSTTFBanner chart's image
FUTURE METALS NL
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$105K
Capitalization8.53M
First Tellurium
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$43.24K
Capitalization7.49M
FMELF vs FSTTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FMELF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSTTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMELF vs. FSTTF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMELF is a Hold and FSTTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FMELF: $0.02 vs. FSTTF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: FMELF and FSTTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMELF: 111% vs. FSTTF: 237%
Market capitalization -- FMELF: $8.53M vs. FSTTF: $7.49M
FMELF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.53M. FSTTF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMELF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFSTTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMELF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSTTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMELF is a better buy in the long-term than FSTTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMELF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSTTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMELF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • FSTTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMELF is a better buy in the short-term than FSTTF.

Price Growth

FMELF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.00% price change this week, while FSTTF (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMELF($8.53M) has a higher market cap than FSTTF($7.49M). FMELF YTD gains are higher at: 5.000 vs. FSTTF (-5.474). FSTTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.74M vs. FMELF (-6.65M).
FMELFFSTTFFMELF / FSTTF
Capitalization8.53M7.49M114%
EBITDA-6.65M-1.74M382%
Gain YTD5.000-5.474-91%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A859K-
Total DebtN/A183K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSTTF: Fundamental Ratings
FSTTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMELFFSTTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMELF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSTTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VIVHY3.340.01
+0.15%
Vivendi SE
KRIUF13.44N/A
N/A
Keg Royalties Income Fund (The)
CGIUF1.74N/A
N/A
ESR REIT
FPBC5.92N/A
N/A
First Pacific Bancorp
KDKGF0.07N/A
-3.14%
Klondike Gold Corp.

FMELF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMELF and PDLMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMELF and PDLMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMELF
1D Price
Change %
FMELF100%
+5.00%
PDLMF - FMELF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLTMF - FMELF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEXPF - FMELF
15%
Poorly correlated
-6.39%
ESGLF - FMELF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSTTF - FMELF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FSTTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSTTF and PUCCF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSTTF and PUCCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSTTF
1D Price
Change %
FSTTF100%
N/A
PUCCF - FSTTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DYNR - FSTTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+7.14%
PUMXF - FSTTF
13%
Poorly correlated
+17.65%
SNGCF - FSTTF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
ACRG - FSTTF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More