Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMEFX vs RRMGX
FMEFX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts FMEFX vs RRMGX
Nuveen Small/Mid Cap Growth Opp R6
Price$42.61
Change+$0.09 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets168.89M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$85.77
Change+$0.13 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.6B
FMEFX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMEFX vs. RRMGX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMEFX is a Hold and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. FMEFX (169M). FMEFX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . FMEFX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: FMEFX (13 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). RRMGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FMEFX (0.91). FMEFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RRMGX (22.60). RRMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMEFX: RRMGX (2500) vs FMEFX (1000000). FMEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.49 vs. RRMGX (-4.31). RRMGX (-18.03) and FMEFX (-18.51) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FMEFX | RRMGX | FMEFX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.29 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.29 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.305 | -2.445 | -94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 169M | 25.6B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.49 | -4.31 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.93 | 6.81 | 586% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.51 | -18.03 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.27 | 22.63 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement