Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMDRX vs LZFOX
FMDRX vs LZFOX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs LZFOX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R6
Price$32.22
Change+$0.07 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.53B
Lazard Equity Franchise Open Shares
Price$7.20
Change+$0.02 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.55M
FMDRX vs LZFOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. LZFOX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a Hold and LZFOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.53B vs. LZFOX (37.5M). LZFOX pays higher dividends than FMDRX: LZFOX (2.10) vs FMDRX (1.76). FMDRX was incepted earlier than LZFOX: FMDRX (13 years) vs LZFOX (8 years). LZFOX (3.21) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.88). LZFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FMDRX (34.55). LZFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: LZFOX (2500) vs FMDRX (1000000). FMDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.80 vs. LZFOX (-14.06). FMDRX return over 5 years is better than : 20.78 vs. LZFOX (-23.85).
| FMDRX | LZFOX | FMDRX / LZFOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.20 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 3.21 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.304 | -13.541 | -91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.53B | 37.5M | 25,411% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 2.10 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.80 | -14.06 | -84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.19 | -16.83 | -138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.78 | -23.85 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement