Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMDRX vs LZFIX
FMDRX vs LZFIX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs LZFIX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R6
Price$33.48
Change-$0.37 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.32B
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$8.17
Change-$0.03 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.74M
FMDRX vs LZFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. LZFIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a Hold and LZFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.32B vs. LZFIX (42.7M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than FMDRX: LZFIX (2.27) vs FMDRX (1.79). FMDRX was incepted earlier than LZFIX: FMDRX (13 years) vs LZFIX (8 years). LZFIX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.88). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FMDRX (34.55). LZFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: LZFIX (10000) vs FMDRX (1000000). FMDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.36 vs. LZFIX (-15.47). FMDRX return over 5 years is better than : 30.41 vs. LZFIX (-8.29).
| FMDRX | LZFIX | FMDRX / LZFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.94 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.94 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.696 | -1.893 | -882% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.32B | 42.7M | 21,827% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 2.27 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.36 | -15.47 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.85 | -14.16 | -140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.41 | -8.29 | -367% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers