Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMDRX vs LZFIX
FMDRX vs LZFIX Comparison
Open Charts FMDRX vs LZFIX
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery R6
Price$32.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.51B
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr
Price$7.18
Change+$0.01 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.44M
FMDRX vs LZFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMDRX vs. LZFIX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMDRX is a Hold and LZFIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMDRX has more cash in the bank: 9.51B vs. LZFIX (37.4M). LZFIX pays higher dividends than FMDRX: LZFIX (2.36) vs FMDRX (1.76). FMDRX was incepted earlier than LZFIX: FMDRX (13 years) vs LZFIX (8 years). LZFIX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FMDRX (0.88). LZFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FMDRX (34.55). LZFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMDRX: LZFIX (10000) vs FMDRX (1000000). FMDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.79 vs. LZFIX (-13.88). FMDRX return over 5 years is better than : 20.52 vs. LZFIX (-23.36).
| FMDRX | LZFIX | FMDRX / LZFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.94 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.94 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.060 | -13.781 | -88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 10000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.51B | 37.4M | 25,425% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 2.36 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.79 | -13.88 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.88 | -16.63 | -138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.52 | -23.36 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement