FMCXF
Price
$2.23
Change
-$0.02 (-0.89%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
855.42M
TRBMF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
48.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMCXF vs TRBMF

Header iconFMCXF vs TRBMF Comparison
Open Charts FMCXF vs TRBMFBanner chart's image
Foran Mining
Price$2.23
Change-$0.02 (-0.89%)
Volume$28.63K
Capitalization855.42M
Torq Resources
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization48.29M
FMCXF vs TRBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FMCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMCXF vs. TRBMF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCXF is a Hold and TRBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FMCXF: $2.23 vs. TRBMF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: FMCXF and TRBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMCXF: 35% vs. TRBMF: 7%
Market capitalization -- FMCXF: $855.42M vs. TRBMF: $48.29M
FMCXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $855.42M. TRBMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $48.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMCXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMCXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMCXF is a better buy in the long-term than TRBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMCXF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRBMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMCXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TRBMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRBMF is a better buy in the short-term than FMCXF.

Price Growth

FMCXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.70% price change this week, while TRBMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +3.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMCXF($855M) has a higher market cap than TRBMF($48.3M). TRBMF YTD gains are higher at: 38.798 vs. FMCXF (-18.315). FMCXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -11.42M vs. TRBMF (-13.86M). FMCXF has more cash in the bank: 158M vs. TRBMF (14.3M). TRBMF has less debt than FMCXF: TRBMF (2.04M) vs FMCXF (35.1M). FMCXF (0) and TRBMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FMCXFTRBMFFMCXF / TRBMF
Capitalization855M48.3M1,770%
EBITDA-11.42M-13.86M82%
Gain YTD-18.31538.798-47%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash158M14.3M1,105%
Total Debt35.1M2.04M1,721%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMCXF vs TRBMF: Fundamental Ratings
FMCXF
TRBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23100
SMR RATING
1..100
91100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6256
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMCXF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as TRBMF (60). This means that FMCXF’s stock grew similarly to TRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

FMCXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TRBMF (100). This means that FMCXF’s stock grew significantly faster than TRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

FMCXF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as TRBMF (100). This means that FMCXF’s stock grew similarly to TRBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TRBMF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as FMCXF (62). This means that TRBMF’s stock grew similarly to FMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

TRBMF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FMCXF (100). This means that TRBMF’s stock grew similarly to FMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMCXFTRBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCMIX159.192.28
+1.45%
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst2
CSCRX29.960.37
+1.25%
Columbia Small Cap Growth Inst2
IRVAX25.120.16
+0.64%
Voya Russell Large Cap Value Idx Port A
HSCVX12.190.06
+0.49%
Hunter Small Cap Value I
UGTIX28.400.09
+0.32%
Victory Growth and Tax Strategy Ins

FMCXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMCXF has been loosely correlated with CSCCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMCXF jumps, then CSCCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMCXF
1D Price
Change %
FMCXF100%
-0.89%
CSCCF - FMCXF
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
LUNMF - FMCXF
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
IVPAF - FMCXF
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
HBM - FMCXF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
AAGFF - FMCXF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More

TRBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRBMF and NKGFF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRBMF and NKGFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRBMF
1D Price
Change %
TRBMF100%
+0.79%
NKGFF - TRBMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
AAGFF - TRBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
NRGYF - TRBMF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMCXF - TRBMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
CSCCF - TRBMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
More