FMCXF
Price
$2.28
Change
+$0.01 (+0.44%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.22B
IVPAF
Price
$9.06
Change
+$0.25 (+2.84%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.27B
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMCXF vs IVPAF

Header iconFMCXF vs IVPAF Comparison
Open Charts FMCXF vs IVPAFBanner chart's image
Foran Mining
Price$2.28
Change+$0.01 (+0.44%)
Volume$72.68K
Capitalization1.22B
Ivanhoe Mines
Price$9.06
Change+$0.25 (+2.84%)
Volume$95.73K
Capitalization12.27B
FMCXF vs IVPAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FMCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMCXF vs. IVPAF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCXF is a Buy and IVPAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FMCXF: $2.28 vs. IVPAF: $9.06)
Brand notoriety: FMCXF and IVPAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMCXF: 45% vs. IVPAF: 33%
Market capitalization -- FMCXF: $1.22B vs. IVPAF: $12.27B
FMCXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.22B. IVPAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $12.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMCXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIVPAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMCXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IVPAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMCXF is a better buy in the long-term than IVPAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMCXF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IVPAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMCXF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IVPAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IVPAF is a better buy in the short-term than FMCXF.

Price Growth

FMCXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.11% price change this week, while IVPAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

IVPAF is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVPAF($12.3B) has a higher market cap than FMCXF($1.22B). FMCXF YTD gains are higher at: -16.484 vs. IVPAF (-23.480). IVPAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 355M vs. FMCXF (6.52M). IVPAF has more cash in the bank: 655M vs. FMCXF (397M). FMCXF has less debt than IVPAF: FMCXF (410M) vs IVPAF (1.17B). IVPAF has higher revenues than FMCXF: IVPAF (215M) vs FMCXF (0).
FMCXFIVPAFFMCXF / IVPAF
Capitalization1.22B12.3B10%
EBITDA6.52M355M2%
Gain YTD-16.484-23.48070%
P/E RatioN/A31.24-
Revenue0215M-
Total Cash397M655M61%
Total Debt410M1.17B35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMCXF vs IVPAF: Fundamental Ratings
FMCXF
IVPAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1015
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3357
SMR RATING
1..100
9277
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5757
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMCXF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IVPAF (91). This means that FMCXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.

FMCXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as IVPAF (57). This means that FMCXF’s stock grew similarly to IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as FMCXF (92). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to FMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as FMCXF (57). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to FMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as FMCXF (100). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to FMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMCXFIVPAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GREAX11.300.11
+0.98%
Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities A
HDGVX37.36N/A
N/A
Hartford Dividend and Growth R6
JIJRX15.21N/A
N/A
JHancock International Dynamic Gr R6
LBGCX38.94N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Mid Cap Growth C
IVINX40.26-0.08
-0.20%
Macquarie Global Growth Fund Class A

FMCXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMCXF has been loosely correlated with IVPAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMCXF jumps, then IVPAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMCXF
1D Price
Change %
FMCXF100%
+0.44%
IVPAF - FMCXF
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
AAGFF - FMCXF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
LTSRF - FMCXF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
TECK - FMCXF
28%
Poorly correlated
+4.70%
ADMLF - FMCXF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
More

IVPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVPAF has been loosely correlated with GLNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IVPAF jumps, then GLNCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVPAF
1D Price
Change %
IVPAF100%
+2.84%
GLNCY - IVPAF
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
GLCNF - IVPAF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
GMBXF - IVPAF
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
BDNNY - IVPAF
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
FMCXF - IVPAF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
More