FMCXF
Price
$1.93
Change
-$0.02 (-1.03%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
855.42M
FNCJF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
15.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMCXF vs FNCJF

Header iconFMCXF vs FNCJF Comparison
Open Charts FMCXF vs FNCJFBanner chart's image
Foran Mining
Price$1.93
Change-$0.02 (-1.03%)
Volume$138.1K
Capitalization855.42M
Fancamp Exploration
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.77K
Capitalization15.31M
FMCXF vs FNCJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FMCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMCXF vs. FNCJF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCXF is a Hold and FNCJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FMCXF: $1.93 vs. FNCJF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: FMCXF and FNCJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMCXF: 137% vs. FNCJF: 37%
Market capitalization -- FMCXF: $855.42M vs. FNCJF: $15.31M
FMCXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $855.42M. FNCJF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $15.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMCXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFNCJF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMCXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FNCJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMCXF is a better buy in the long-term than FNCJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMCXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNCJF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMCXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FNCJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FMCXF and FNCJF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FMCXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.50% price change this week, while FNCJF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -8.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMCXF($855M) has a higher market cap than FNCJF($15.3M). FNCJF YTD gains are higher at: 41.700 vs. FMCXF (-29.304). FNCJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.6M vs. FMCXF (-11.42M). FMCXF has more cash in the bank: 158M vs. FNCJF (26.3M). FNCJF has less debt than FMCXF: FNCJF (150K) vs FMCXF (35.1M). FMCXF (0) and FNCJF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FMCXFFNCJFFMCXF / FNCJF
Capitalization855M15.3M5,588%
EBITDA-11.42M14.6M-78%
Gain YTD-29.30441.700-70%
P/E RatioN/A1.14-
Revenue00-
Total Cash158M26.3M601%
Total Debt35.1M150K23,400%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMCXF vs FNCJF: Fundamental Ratings
FMCXF
FNCJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3385
SMR RATING
1..100
9069
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10092
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMCXF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FNCJF (65). This means that FMCXF’s stock grew similarly to FNCJF’s over the last 12 months.

FMCXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNCJF (85). This means that FMCXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNCJF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCJF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as FMCXF (90). This means that FNCJF’s stock grew similarly to FMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCJF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMCXF (89). This means that FNCJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCJF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as FMCXF (100). This means that FNCJF’s stock grew similarly to FMCXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMCXFFNCJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMCXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVRUX17.680.11
+0.63%
UBS US Dividend Ruler P
WFPRX50.480.22
+0.44%
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value R6
PVEJX15.940.06
+0.38%
Principal MidCap Value I J
EMAAX16.170.01
+0.06%
Gabelli Entpr Mergers & Acquisitions A
JRGRX29.19-0.07
-0.24%
JHancock Regional Bank R6

FMCXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMCXF has been loosely correlated with CSCCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMCXF jumps, then CSCCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMCXF
1D Price
Change %
FMCXF100%
-1.03%
CSCCF - FMCXF
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.34%
LUNMF - FMCXF
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
IVPAF - FMCXF
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
HBM - FMCXF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
AAGFF - FMCXF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
More

FNCJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNCJF and NAK have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNCJF and NAK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNCJF
1D Price
Change %
FNCJF100%
-6.23%
NAK - FNCJF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
FQVLF - FNCJF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
FDCFF - FNCJF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.21%
FGOVF - FNCJF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
FMCXF - FNCJF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
More