Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCVX vs SSGSX
FMCVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FMCVX vs SSGSX
Franklin Mutual Small-Mid Cap Val R6
Price$25.76
Change+$0.17 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.13M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
FMCVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. FMCVX (206M). FMCVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FMCVX (0.76) vs SSGSX (0.51). FMCVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FMCVX (12 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FMCVX (0.96). FMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.90 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMCVX: SSGSX (2500) vs FMCVX (1000000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.26 vs. FMCVX (-6.69). FMCVX (30.76) and SSGSX (29.33) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FMCVX | SSGSX | FMCVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.26 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.26 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.834 | -2.068 | -137% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 206M | 5.82B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.51 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.69 | -1.26 | 531% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.17 | 2.38 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.76 | 29.33 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.77 | 16.52 | -144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement