Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCVX vs SSGSX
FMCVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts FMCVX vs SSGSX
Franklin Mutual Small-Mid Cap Val R6
Price$25.83
Change-$0.45 (-1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.93M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
FMCVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. FMCVX (207M). FMCVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: FMCVX (0.73) vs SSGSX (0.49). FMCVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: FMCVX (13 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than FMCVX (0.96). FMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.90 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMCVX: SSGSX (2500) vs FMCVX (1000000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.62 vs. FMCVX (-21.35). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 8.71 vs. FMCVX (7.82).
| FMCVX | SSGSX | FMCVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.26 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.26 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.910 | -0.129 | -3,800% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 207M | 5.23B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.49 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.35 | -12.62 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.23 | -6.25 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.82 | 8.71 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.01 | 20.45 | -88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement