FMBM
Price
$21.56
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
SMBC
Price
$65.30
Change
-$0.90 (-1.36%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:45 PM (EDT)
73 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FMBM vs SMBC

Header iconFMBM vs SMBC Comparison
Open Charts FMBM vs SMBCBanner chart's image
F & M Bank
Price$21.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.18K
CapitalizationN/A
Southern Missouri Ban
Price$65.30
Change-$0.90 (-1.36%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
FMBM vs SMBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMBM vs. SMBC commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBM is a Hold and SMBC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (FMBM: $21.56 vs. SMBC: $66.20)
Brand notoriety: FMBM and SMBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMBM: 201% vs. SMBC: 86%
Market capitalization -- FMBM: $77.22M vs. SMBC: $497.01M
FMBM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $77.22M. SMBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $497.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMBM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMBC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FMBM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMBC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMBC is a better buy in the long-term than FMBM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FMBM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.74% price change this week, while SMBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

SMBC is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMBC($497M) has a higher market cap than FMBM($77.2M). FMBM has higher P/E ratio than SMBC: FMBM (14.56) vs SMBC (11.19). SMBC YTD gains are higher at: 25.810 vs. FMBM (17.923). FMBM has less debt than SMBC: FMBM (61.9M) vs SMBC (136M). SMBC has higher revenues than FMBM: SMBC (167M) vs FMBM (43.2M).
FMBMSMBCFMBM / SMBC
Capitalization77.2M497M16%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.92325.81069%
P/E Ratio14.5611.19130%
Revenue43.2M167M26%
Total Cash17.6MN/A-
Total Debt61.9M136M46%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMBM vs SMBC: Fundamental Ratings
FMBM
SMBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7477
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8829
SMR RATING
1..100
5624
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4839
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9032
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMBM's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMBC (82) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FMBM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMBC’s over the last 12 months.

SMBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMBM (88) in the null industry. This means that SMBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMBM’s over the last 12 months.

SMBC's SMR Rating (24) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FMBM (56) in the null industry. This means that SMBC’s stock grew similarly to FMBM’s over the last 12 months.

SMBC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FMBM (48) in the null industry. This means that SMBC’s stock grew similarly to FMBM’s over the last 12 months.

SMBC's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMBM (90) in the null industry. This means that SMBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMBM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

FMBM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMBM and HLAN have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMBM and HLAN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBM
1D Price
Change %
FMBM100%
+1.03%
HLAN - FMBM
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWFL - FMBM
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
HIFS - FMBM
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
SMBC - FMBM
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
ESSA - FMBM
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
More

SMBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMBC has been closely correlated with TRST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMBC jumps, then TRST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMBC
1D Price
Change %
SMBC100%
+0.11%
TRST - SMBC
86%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
THFF - SMBC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
OCFC - SMBC
84%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
BUSE - SMBC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
FMBH - SMBC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
More