FMBL
Price
$7835.00
Change
-$4.00 (-0.05%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
956.86M
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WTBFB
Price
$344.00
Change
-$0.50 (-0.15%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
867.09M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMBL vs WTBFB

Header iconFMBL vs WTBFB Comparison
Open Charts FMBL vs WTBFBBanner chart's image
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach (CA)
Price$7835.00
Change-$4.00 (-0.05%)
Volume$24
Capitalization956.86M
W.T.B. Financial
Price$344.00
Change-$0.50 (-0.15%)
Volume$6
Capitalization867.09M
FMBL vs WTBFB Comparison Chart in %
FMBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WTBFB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMBL vs. WTBFB commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBL is a Buy and WTBFB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FMBL: $7835.00 vs. WTBFB: $344.00)
Brand notoriety: FMBL and WTBFB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMBL: 55% vs. WTBFB: 1%
Market capitalization -- FMBL: $956.86M vs. WTBFB: $867.09M
FMBL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $956.86M. WTBFB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $867.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMBL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWTBFB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FMBL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WTBFB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMBL is a better buy in the long-term than WTBFB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMBL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTBFB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMBL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WTBFB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WTBFB is a better buy in the short-term than FMBL.

Price Growth

FMBL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.06% price change this week, while WTBFB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMBL is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBL($957M) has a higher market cap than WTBFB($867M). FMBL has higher P/E ratio than WTBFB: FMBL (18.34) vs WTBFB (10.06). FMBL YTD gains are higher at: 39.379 vs. WTBFB (13.030). FMBL has less debt than WTBFB: FMBL (300M) vs WTBFB (500M). WTBFB has higher revenues than FMBL: WTBFB (380M) vs FMBL (265M).
FMBLWTBFBFMBL / WTBFB
Capitalization957M867M110%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD39.37913.030302%
P/E Ratio18.3410.06182%
Revenue265M380M70%
Total CashN/A165M-
Total Debt300M500M60%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMBL vs WTBFB: Fundamental Ratings
FMBL
WTBFB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8888
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6054
SMR RATING
1..100
3121
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1488
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMBL's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as WTBFB (93). This means that FMBL’s stock grew similarly to WTBFB’s over the last 12 months.

WTBFB's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as FMBL (60). This means that WTBFB’s stock grew similarly to FMBL’s over the last 12 months.

WTBFB's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as FMBL (31). This means that WTBFB’s stock grew similarly to FMBL’s over the last 12 months.

FMBL's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as WTBFB (45). This means that FMBL’s stock grew similarly to WTBFB’s over the last 12 months.

FMBL's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WTBFB (88). This means that FMBL’s stock grew significantly faster than WTBFB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMBLWTBFB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
36%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WTBFB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLFNX35.030.25
+0.72%
Hennessy Large Cap Financial Investor
PWTYX57.100.09
+0.16%
UBS US Allocation P
FZAPX92.99N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Sel Z
LADPX23.71-0.05
-0.21%
Lord Abbett Developing Growth P
LGOQX26.67-0.10
-0.37%
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities R2

FMBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMBL and CBHC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMBL and CBHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBL
1D Price
Change %
FMBL100%
-0.05%
CBHC - FMBL
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVVB - FMBL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MVLY - FMBL
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTBFB - FMBL
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
ADBKF - FMBL
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WTBFB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTBFB has been loosely correlated with BANF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTBFB jumps, then BANF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTBFB
1D Price
Change %
WTBFB100%
-0.15%
BANF - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
STBA - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
TCBK - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
EFSC - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
ASB - WTBFB
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More