FMBL
Price
$5650.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
637.7M
4 days until earnings call
IBWC
Price
$39.43
Change
-$2.57 (-6.12%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
14.85M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMBL vs IBWC

Header iconFMBL vs IBWC Comparison
Open Charts FMBL vs IBWCBanner chart's image
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach (CA)
Price$5650.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2
Capitalization637.7M
IBW Financial
Price$39.43
Change-$2.57 (-6.12%)
Volume$1.13K
Capitalization14.85M
FMBL vs IBWC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FMBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IBWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMBL vs. IBWC commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBL is a StrongBuy and IBWC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FMBL: $5650.00 vs. IBWC: $39.43)
Brand notoriety: FMBL and IBWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMBL: 5% vs. IBWC: 165%
Market capitalization -- FMBL: $637.7M vs. IBWC: $14.85M
FMBL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $637.7M. IBWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $14.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMBL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIBWC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FMBL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IBWC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMBL is a better buy in the long-term than IBWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMBL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBWC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMBL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IBWC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMBL is a better buy in the short-term than IBWC.

Price Growth

FMBL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.36% price change this week, while IBWC (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMBL is expected to report earnings on Jul 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBL($638M) has a higher market cap than IBWC($14.9M). FMBL YTD gains are higher at: 0.107 vs. IBWC (-5.557).
FMBLIBWCFMBL / IBWC
Capitalization638M14.9M4,282%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.107-5.557-2%
P/E Ratio7.14N/A-
Revenue311MN/A-
Total Cash87.7MN/A-
Total Debt1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMBL vs IBWC: Fundamental Ratings
FMBL
IBWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
19100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
223
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMBL's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as IBWC (37). This means that FMBL’s stock grew similarly to IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

FMBL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IBWC (100). This means that FMBL’s stock grew similarly to IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

FMBL's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IBWC (100). This means that FMBL’s stock grew significantly faster than IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

FMBL's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as IBWC (61). This means that FMBL’s stock grew similarly to IBWC’s over the last 12 months.

IBWC's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as FMBL (22). This means that IBWC’s stock grew similarly to FMBL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMBLIBWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
18%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
14%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IBWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JRSS0.02N/A
+26.72%
JRSIS Health Care Corp
IFPJF10.63N/A
N/A
Informa Plc.
GDVTZ385.00N/A
N/A
Gould Investors, L.P.
CHYI0.27N/A
N/A
CHYKINGYOUNG INVT DEV HLDGS INC.
TMVWF14.16N/A
N/A
TeamViewer SE

FMBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMBL and IBWC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMBL and IBWC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBL
1D Price
Change %
FMBL100%
N/A
IBWC - FMBL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGNLF - FMBL
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTBFB - FMBL
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNFI - FMBL
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLEW - FMBL
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IBWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBWC has been loosely correlated with SWZNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IBWC jumps, then SWZNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBWC
1D Price
Change %
IBWC100%
N/A
SWZNF - IBWC
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHMG - IBWC
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
MCB - IBWC
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
FMBL - IBWC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPCGF - IBWC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More