FMBL
Price
$7835.00
Change
-$4.00 (-0.05%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
956.86M
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FNFI
Price
$7.80
Change
-$0.15 (-1.89%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
8.68M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMBL vs FNFI

Header iconFMBL vs FNFI Comparison
Open Charts FMBL vs FNFIBanner chart's image
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach (CA)
Price$7835.00
Change-$4.00 (-0.05%)
Volume$24
Capitalization956.86M
First Niles Financial
Price$7.80
Change-$0.15 (-1.89%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.68M
FMBL vs FNFI Comparison Chart in %
FMBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FNFI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMBL vs. FNFI commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBL is a Buy and FNFI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FMBL: $7835.00 vs. FNFI: $7.95)
Brand notoriety: FMBL and FNFI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMBL: 55% vs. FNFI: 25%
Market capitalization -- FMBL: $956.86M vs. FNFI: $8.68M
FMBL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $956.86M. FNFI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $8.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMBL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFNFI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMBL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FNFI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMBL is a better buy in the long-term than FNFI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMBL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNFI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMBL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FNFI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMBL is a better buy in the short-term than FNFI.

Price Growth

FMBL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.06% price change this week, while FNFI (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMBL is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBL($957M) has a higher market cap than FNFI($8.68M). FMBL has higher P/E ratio than FNFI: FMBL (18.34) vs FNFI (12.19). FMBL YTD gains are higher at: 39.379 vs. FNFI (-2.746). FNFI has less debt than FMBL: FNFI (30.1M) vs FMBL (300M). FMBL has higher revenues than FNFI: FMBL (265M) vs FNFI (8M).
FMBLFNFIFMBL / FNFI
Capitalization957M8.68M11,023%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD39.379-2.746-1,434%
P/E Ratio18.3412.19150%
Revenue265M8M3,313%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt300M30.1M997%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMBL vs FNFI: Fundamental Ratings
FMBL
FNFI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8871
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60100
SMR RATING
1..100
3179
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4080
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1453
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a47

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNFI's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as FMBL (73). This means that FNFI’s stock grew similarly to FMBL’s over the last 12 months.

FMBL's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNFI (100). This means that FMBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNFI’s over the last 12 months.

FMBL's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNFI (79). This means that FMBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNFI’s over the last 12 months.

FMBL's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNFI (80). This means that FMBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNFI’s over the last 12 months.

FMBL's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNFI (53). This means that FMBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNFI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMBLFNFI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
38%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FNFI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HFECX57.670.37
+0.65%
Janus Henderson European Focus C
WEUSX15.360.06
+0.39%
SEI World Equity Ex-US A (SIIT)
WIFMX3.730.01
+0.27%
Wasatch Frontier Emerg Sm Countrs Instl
MSTVX10.890.01
+0.09%
Morningstar Alternatives
IHIFX5.94-0.02
-0.34%
Macquarie High Income Fund Class R6

FMBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMBL and CBHC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMBL and CBHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBL
1D Price
Change %
FMBL100%
-0.05%
CBHC - FMBL
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVVB - FMBL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MVLY - FMBL
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTBFB - FMBL
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
ADBKF - FMBL
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FNFI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNFI and CIHHF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNFI and CIHHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNFI
1D Price
Change %
FNFI100%
+9.50%
CIHHF - FNFI
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNRN - FNFI
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
FMCB - FNFI
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
FKYS - FNFI
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMBL - FNFI
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
More