FMBL
Price
$7835.00
Change
-$4.00 (-0.05%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
956.86M
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FMFG
Price
$16.88
Change
+$0.26 (+1.56%)
Updated
Nov 10 closing price
Capitalization
54.07M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMBL vs FMFG

Header iconFMBL vs FMFG Comparison
Open Charts FMBL vs FMFGBanner chart's image
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach (CA)
Price$7835.00
Change-$4.00 (-0.05%)
Volume$24
Capitalization956.86M
Farmers and Merchants Bancshares
Price$16.88
Change+$0.26 (+1.56%)
Volume$297
Capitalization54.07M
FMBL vs FMFG Comparison Chart in %
FMBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMBL vs. FMFG commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBL is a Buy and FMFG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FMBL: $7835.00 vs. FMFG: $16.88)
Brand notoriety: FMBL and FMFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMBL: 54% vs. FMFG: 36%
Market capitalization -- FMBL: $956.86M vs. FMFG: $54.07M
FMBL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $956.86M. FMFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $54.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMBL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFMFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FMBL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FMFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FMBL and FMFG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMBL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMFG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMBL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FMFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMFG is a better buy in the short-term than FMBL.

Price Growth

FMBL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.19% price change this week, while FMFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMBL is expected to report earnings on Jan 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBL($957M) has a higher market cap than FMFG($54.1M). FMBL has higher P/E ratio than FMFG: FMBL (18.34) vs FMFG (10.82). FMBL YTD gains are higher at: 39.379 vs. FMFG (-15.917). FMFG has less debt than FMBL: FMFG (20.4M) vs FMBL (300M). FMBL has higher revenues than FMFG: FMBL (265M) vs FMFG (23.2M).
FMBLFMFGFMBL / FMFG
Capitalization957M54.1M1,769%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD39.379-15.917-247%
P/E Ratio18.3410.82169%
Revenue265M23.2M1,142%
Total CashN/A21.8M-
Total Debt300M20.4M1,471%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMBL vs FMFG: Fundamental Ratings
FMBL
FMFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8887
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6063
SMR RATING
1..100
3169
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1429
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMFG's Valuation (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMBL (74). This means that FMFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMBL’s over the last 12 months.

FMBL's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as FMFG (63). This means that FMBL’s stock grew similarly to FMFG’s over the last 12 months.

FMBL's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMFG (69). This means that FMBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMFG’s over the last 12 months.

FMBL's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FMFG (49). This means that FMBL’s stock grew similarly to FMFG’s over the last 12 months.

FMBL's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as FMFG (29). This means that FMBL’s stock grew similarly to FMFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMBLFMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
34%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIERX28.25-0.11
-0.39%
Brandes International Equity R6
HFECX57.29-0.38
-0.66%
Janus Henderson European Focus C
JACRX13.57-0.10
-0.73%
Easterly Global Real Estate C
WBCCX10.86-0.10
-0.91%
TETON Westwood Balanced C
NBPTX52.14-0.51
-0.97%
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Tr

FMBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMBL and CBHC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMBL and CBHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBL
1D Price
Change %
FMBL100%
N/A
CBHC - FMBL
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVVB - FMBL
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MVLY - FMBL
22%
Poorly correlated
+6.93%
WTBFB - FMBL
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADBKF - FMBL
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FMFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMFG and COSO have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMFG and COSO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMFG
1D Price
Change %
FMFG100%
N/A
COSO - FMFG
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
BKIMF - FMFG
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMBL - FMFG
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNRN - FMFG
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
FNFI - FMFG
-0%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
More