FMBH
Price
$36.67
Change
-$0.55 (-1.48%)
Updated
Nov 14, 10:53 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
896.54M
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HAFC
Price
$26.74
Change
-$0.16 (-0.59%)
Updated
Nov 14, 11:35 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
805.8M
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMBH vs HAFC

Header iconFMBH vs HAFC Comparison
Open Charts FMBH vs HAFCBanner chart's image
First Mid Bancshares
Price$36.67
Change-$0.55 (-1.48%)
Volume$200
Capitalization896.54M
Hanmi Financial
Price$26.74
Change-$0.16 (-0.59%)
Volume$100
Capitalization805.8M
FMBH vs HAFC Comparison Chart in %
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HAFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMBH vs. HAFC commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBH is a Buy and HAFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FMBH: $37.22 vs. HAFC: $26.90)
Brand notoriety: FMBH and HAFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMBH: 136% vs. HAFC: 108%
Market capitalization -- FMBH: $896.54M vs. HAFC: $805.8M
FMBH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $896.54M. HAFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $805.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMBH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHAFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FMBH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HAFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAFC is a better buy in the long-term than FMBH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMBH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMBH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HAFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMBH is a better buy in the short-term than HAFC.

Price Growth

FMBH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.86% price change this week, while HAFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

HAFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBH($897M) has a higher market cap than HAFC($806M). HAFC has higher P/E ratio than FMBH: HAFC (11.21) vs FMBH (10.23). HAFC YTD gains are higher at: 19.107 vs. FMBH (3.048). HAFC has more cash in the bank: 78.8M vs. FMBH (16.1M). HAFC has less debt than FMBH: HAFC (258M) vs FMBH (363M). FMBH has higher revenues than HAFC: FMBH (331M) vs HAFC (246M).
FMBHHAFCFMBH / HAFC
Capitalization897M806M111%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.04819.10716%
P/E Ratio10.2311.2191%
Revenue331M246M135%
Total Cash16.1M78.8M20%
Total Debt363M258M141%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMBH vs HAFC: Fundamental Ratings
FMBH
HAFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1472
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5625
SMR RATING
1..100
2529
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6951
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAFC's Valuation (27) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMBH (98). This means that HAFC’s stock grew significantly faster than FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (56). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (29). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (56). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (69). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMBHHAFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HAFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIIIX23.44N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor International Growth I
EQNCX23.60-0.31
-1.30%
MFS Equity Income C
AIMOX18.49-0.25
-1.33%
AQR International Momentum Style I
JCCIX15.97-0.29
-1.78%
JHancock Small Cap Core I
INVNX21.76-0.44
-1.98%
Evolutionary Tree Innovators I

FMBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMBH has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMBH jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBH
1D Price
Change %
FMBH100%
-1.14%
TCBK - FMBH
92%
Closely correlated
-1.49%
TRMK - FMBH
90%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
STBA - FMBH
90%
Closely correlated
-1.41%
PEBO - FMBH
89%
Closely correlated
-2.20%
WSFS - FMBH
88%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
More

HAFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAFC has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAFC jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFC
1D Price
Change %
HAFC100%
N/A
TRMK - HAFC
82%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
PEBO - HAFC
80%
Closely correlated
-2.20%
HOPE - HAFC
79%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
UVSP - HAFC
78%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
FMBH - HAFC
78%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
More