FMBH
Price
$44.40
Change
+$0.60 (+1.37%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:34 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.05B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HAFC
Price
$27.96
Change
+$0.51 (+1.86%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
820.61M
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMBH vs HAFC

Header iconFMBH vs HAFC Comparison
Open Charts FMBH vs HAFCBanner chart's image
First Mid Bancshares
Price$44.40
Change+$0.60 (+1.37%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.05B
Hanmi Financial
Price$27.96
Change+$0.51 (+1.86%)
Volume$300
Capitalization820.61M
FMBH vs HAFC Comparison Chart in %
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HAFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMBH vs. HAFC commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBH is a StrongBuy and HAFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FMBH: $43.80 vs. HAFC: $27.45)
Brand notoriety: FMBH and HAFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMBH: 113% vs. HAFC: 110%
Market capitalization -- FMBH: $1.05B vs. HAFC: $820.61M
FMBH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.05B. HAFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $820.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMBH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHAFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FMBH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HAFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAFC is a better buy in the long-term than FMBH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMBH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMBH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HAFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FMBH and HAFC are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FMBH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.87% price change this week, while HAFC (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

HAFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBH($1.05B) has a higher market cap than HAFC($821M). FMBH (11.45) and HAFC (10.94) have similar P/E ratio . FMBH YTD gains are higher at: 12.308 vs. HAFC (1.554). HAFC has more cash in the bank: 78.8M vs. FMBH (16.1M). HAFC has less debt than FMBH: HAFC (193M) vs FMBH (363M). FMBH has higher revenues than HAFC: FMBH (339M) vs HAFC (260M).
FMBHHAFCFMBH / HAFC
Capitalization1.05B821M128%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.3081.554792%
P/E Ratio11.4510.94105%
Revenue339M260M130%
Total Cash16.1M78.8M20%
Total Debt363M193M188%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMBH vs HAFC: Fundamental Ratings
FMBH
HAFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1617
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6533
SMR RATING
1..100
2527
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4550
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5059
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAFC's Valuation (25) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMBH (98). This means that HAFC’s stock grew significantly faster than FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (65). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (27). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (50). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (59). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMBHHAFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HAFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYCAX96.681.03
+1.08%
Rydex Consumer Products H
MDLVX33.180.08
+0.24%
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Val Inv A
BMCIX31.060.07
+0.23%
BlackRock High Equity Income Instl
BRLVX26.52-0.05
-0.19%
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value R5
OGLCX62.69-1.77
-2.75%
Invesco Global C

FMBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMBH has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMBH jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBH
1D Price
Change %
FMBH100%
+0.50%
STBA - FMBH
91%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
UBSI - FMBH
91%
Closely correlated
+2.11%
TRMK - FMBH
90%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
FFIN - FMBH
90%
Closely correlated
+2.72%
FCF - FMBH
89%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
More

HAFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAFC has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAFC jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFC
1D Price
Change %
HAFC100%
+0.04%
FFBC - HAFC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
TCBK - HAFC
78%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
EWBC - HAFC
77%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
ABCB - HAFC
77%
Closely correlated
+3.84%
FMBH - HAFC
77%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
More