FMBH
Price
$40.42
Change
+$1.05 (+2.67%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
944.34M
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FVCB
Price
$14.07
Change
+$0.02 (+0.14%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
253.95M
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMBH vs FVCB

Header iconFMBH vs FVCB Comparison
Open Charts FMBH vs FVCBBanner chart's image
First Mid Bancshares
Price$40.42
Change+$1.05 (+2.67%)
Volume$2.02K
Capitalization944.34M
FVCBank
Price$14.07
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
Volume$200
Capitalization253.95M
FMBH vs FVCB Comparison Chart in %
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FVCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMBH vs. FVCB commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBH is a Hold and FVCB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (FMBH: $39.37 vs. FVCB: $14.05)
Brand notoriety: FMBH and FVCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMBH: 81% vs. FVCB: 59%
Market capitalization -- FMBH: $944.34M vs. FVCB: $253.95M
FMBH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $944.34M. FVCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $253.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $159.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMBH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFVCB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMBH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FVCB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FMBH and FVCB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMBH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FVCB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMBH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FVCB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FVCB is a better buy in the short-term than FMBH.

Price Growth

FMBH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.03% price change this week, while FVCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMBH is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

FVCB is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMBH($944M) has a higher market cap than FVCB($254M). FVCB has higher P/E ratio than FMBH: FVCB (12.01) vs FMBH (10.79). FVCB YTD gains are higher at: 1.006 vs. FMBH (0.949). FMBH has more cash in the bank: 16.1M vs. FVCB (14.6M). FVCB has less debt than FMBH: FVCB (25.6M) vs FMBH (363M). FMBH has higher revenues than FVCB: FMBH (339M) vs FVCB (64M).
FMBHFVCBFMBH / FVCB
Capitalization944M254M372%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.9491.00694%
P/E Ratio10.7912.0190%
Revenue339M64M530%
Total Cash16.1M14.6M110%
Total Debt363M25.6M1,418%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMBH vs FVCB: Fundamental Ratings
FMBH
FVCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5423
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6871
SMR RATING
1..100
2453
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5550
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5399
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FVCB's Valuation (55) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMBH (98). This means that FVCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FVCB (71). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's SMR Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FVCB (53). This means that FMBH’s stock grew similarly to FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

FVCB's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMBH (55). This means that FVCB’s stock grew similarly to FMBH’s over the last 12 months.

FMBH's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FVCB (99). This means that FMBH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FVCB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMBHFVCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMBH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FVCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSUGY30.090.02
+0.07%
FORTESCUE LTD.
FRBP9.80N/A
N/A
FRANKLIN BSP CAPITAL CORP
NRKBY25.75N/A
N/A
NKT A/S
SOMC24.50-0.24
-0.97%
Southern Michigan Bancorp, Inc.
SPAIF0.65-0.05
-7.37%
Sparc AI Inc.

FMBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMBH has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMBH jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMBH
1D Price
Change %
FMBH100%
-0.74%
TCBK - FMBH
90%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
BY - FMBH
87%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
TRMK - FMBH
87%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
PEBO - FMBH
87%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
BUSE - FMBH
87%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
More

FVCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FVCB has been closely correlated with HTB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FVCB jumps, then HTB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FVCB
1D Price
Change %
FVCB100%
+0.57%
HTB - FVCB
67%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
MCBS - FVCB
67%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
AX - FVCB
67%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
FMBH - FVCB
66%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
PFIS - FVCB
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
More