Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAT vs GNR
FMAT vs GNR Comparison
Open Charts FMAT vs GNR
Fidelity MSCI Materials ETF
Price$59.40
Change+$7.48 (+14.41%)
Volume$133.27K
Net Assets511.25M
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Glb Ntrl Rs ETF
Price$70.27
Change+$11.30 (+19.16%)
Volume$482.64K
Net Assets4.31B
FMAT vs GNR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAT vs. GNR commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAT is a Buy and GNR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 4.31B vs. FMAT (511M). GNR has a higher annual dividend yield than FMAT: GNR (13.083) vs FMAT (11.843). FMAT was incepted earlier than GNR: FMAT (12 years) vs GNR (15 years). FMAT (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than GNR (0.40). GNR has a higher turnover FMAT (6.00) vs FMAT (6.00).
| FMAT | GNR | FMAT / GNR | |
| Gain YTD | 11.843 | 13.083 | 91% |
| Net Assets | 511M | 4.31B | 12% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.40 | 21% |
| Turnover | 6.00 | 15.00 | 40% |
| Yield | 1.51 | 2.50 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FMAT | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMAT has been closely correlated with DD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMAT jumps, then DD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMAT | 100% | +2.18% | ||
| DD - FMAT | 84% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| PPG - FMAT | 80% Closely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| AXTA - FMAT | 78% Closely correlated | -3.82% | ||
| SEE - FMAT | 76% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| OLN - FMAT | 75% Closely correlated | +3.43% | ||
More | ||||
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y