Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAT vs GNR
FMAT vs GNR Comparison
Open Charts FMAT vs GNR
Fidelity MSCI Materials ETF
Price$51.87
Change+$0.64 (+1.25%)
Volume$909
Net Assets417.6M
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$59.30
Change+$0.45 (+0.76%)
Volume$242
Net Assets3.34B
FMAT vs GNR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAT vs. GNR commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAT is a Hold and GNR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 3.34B vs. FMAT (418M). GNR has a higher annual dividend yield than FMAT: GNR (19.976) vs FMAT (7.715). FMAT was incepted earlier than GNR: FMAT (12 years) vs GNR (15 years). FMAT (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than GNR (0.40). GNR has a higher turnover FMAT (9.00) vs FMAT (9.00).
| FMAT | GNR | FMAT / GNR | |
| Gain YTD | 7.715 | 19.976 | 39% |
| Net Assets | 418M | 3.34B | 13% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.40 | 21% |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 15.00 | 60% |
| Yield | 1.61 | 3.66 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FMAT | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMAT has been closely correlated with DD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMAT jumps, then DD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMAT | 100% | -1.00% | ||
| DD - FMAT | 85% Closely correlated | -1.66% | ||
| PPG - FMAT | 81% Closely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| AXTA - FMAT | 78% Closely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| SEE - FMAT | 77% Closely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| LIN - FMAT | 77% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
More | ||||
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GNR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNR | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| SHEL - GNR | 76% Closely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| RIO - GNR | 74% Closely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| SLB - GNR | 73% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| VALE - GNR | 72% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| CNQ - GNR | 71% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
More | ||||