Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAG vs SCHG
FMAG vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts FMAG vs SCHG
Fidelity Magellan ETF
Price$33.04
Change+$0.42 (+1.29%)
Volume$100
Net Assets238.79M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$27.89
Change-$0.38 (-1.34%)
Volume$11.84M
Net Assets41.95B
FMAG vs SCHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAG vs. SCHG commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAG is a Hold and SCHG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 42B vs. FMAG (239M). FMAG has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: FMAG (5.430) vs SCHG (0.175). FMAG was incepted earlier than SCHG: FMAG (4 years) vs SCHG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FMAG (0.59). FMAG has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| FMAG | SCHG | FMAG / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | 5.430 | 0.175 | 3,107% |
| Net Assets | 239M | 42B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.04 | 1,475% |
| Turnover | 62.00 | 3.00 | 2,067% |
| Yield | 0.12 | 0.41 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FMAG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 27 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FMAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMAG has been closely correlated with WAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMAG jumps, then WAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMAG | 100% | -1.57% | ||
| WAB - FMAG | 77% Closely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| TT - FMAG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| ANET - FMAG | 75% Closely correlated | -3.57% | ||
| TSM - FMAG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| MS - FMAG | 73% Closely correlated | -1.84% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -1.34% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| META - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| COHR - SCHG | 74% Closely correlated | -4.42% | ||
More | ||||