Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMAG vs IWF
FMAG vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts FMAG vs IWF
Fidelity Magellan ETF
Price$33.63
Change-$1.75 (-4.95%)
Volume$46.09K
Net Assets257.33M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$459.18
Change-$15.42 (-3.25%)
Volume$3.97M
Net Assets120.15B
FMAG vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAG vs. IWF commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAG is a Hold and IWF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 120B vs. FMAG (257M). FMAG has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: FMAG (-1.465) vs IWF (-2.983). FMAG was incepted earlier than IWF: FMAG (5 years) vs IWF (26 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than FMAG (0.57). FMAG has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| FMAG | IWF | FMAG / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | -1.465 | -2.983 | 49% |
| Net Assets | 257M | 120B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.18 | 317% |
| Turnover | 70.00 | 13.00 | 538% |
| Yield | 0.09 | 0.36 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FMAG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 85% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 6 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FMAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMAG has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMAG jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMAG | 100% | -1.92% | ||
| ETN - FMAG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| NVDA - FMAG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| APH - FMAG | 79% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| ARES - FMAG | 76% Closely correlated | -10.15% | ||
| MS - FMAG | 75% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -1.78% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | -7.15% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -8.46% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -3.89% | ||
More | ||||