Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLYCX vs RWMFX
FLYCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FLYCX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Large Cap Select C
Price$38.86
Change+$0.22 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.41M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.77
Change+$0.28 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.71B
FLYCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLYCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLYCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. FLYCX (48.4M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FLYCX: RWMFX (1.42) vs FLYCX (0.00). FLYCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FLYCX (23 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). FLYCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). FLYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLYCX: RWMFX (250) vs FLYCX (3000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.12 vs. FLYCX (-2.09). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.29 vs. FLYCX (23.64).
| FLYCX | RWMFX | FLYCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.31 | 568% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.31 | 652% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.124 | 9.760 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250 | 1,200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.4M | 207B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.42 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.09 | 4.12 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.53 | 41.84 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.64 | 50.29 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.91 | 79.57 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement