Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLYCX vs RWMFX
FLYCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FLYCX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Large Cap Select C
Price$39.95
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.67M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$68.38
Change+$0.31 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.48B
FLYCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLYCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLYCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. FLYCX (49.7M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FLYCX: RWMFX (1.38) vs FLYCX (0.00). FLYCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FLYCX (23 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). FLYCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). FLYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLYCX: RWMFX (250) vs FLYCX (3000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.42 vs. FLYCX (-2.63). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.64 vs. FLYCX (19.33).
| FLYCX | RWMFX | FLYCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.31 | 568% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.31 | 652% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.126 | 12.407 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250 | 1,200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.7M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.38 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.63 | 5.42 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.19 | 30.39 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.33 | 43.64 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.51 | 78.18 | 136% |