Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLYCX vs RWMFX
FLYCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts FLYCX vs RWMFX
Nuveen Large Cap Select C
Price$39.37
Change-$0.67 (-1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.88M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.86
Change-$0.96 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
FLYCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLYCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLYCX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. FLYCX (48.9M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FLYCX: RWMFX (1.41) vs FLYCX (0.00). FLYCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FLYCX (23 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). FLYCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). FLYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLYCX: RWMFX (250) vs FLYCX (3000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.94 vs. FLYCX (-3.74). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.34 vs. FLYCX (21.82).
| FLYCX | RWMFX | FLYCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.31 | 568% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 0.31 | 652% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.582 | 9.908 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 250 | 1,200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 48.9M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.74 | 3.94 | -95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.41 | 31.81 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.82 | 45.34 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.21 | 77.15 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement