FLXS
Price
$38.47
Change
-$2.10 (-5.18%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
202.97M
One day until earnings call
HOFT
Price
$8.75
Change
-$0.25 (-2.78%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
94.06M
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLXS vs HOFT

Header iconFLXS vs HOFT Comparison
Open Charts FLXS vs HOFTBanner chart's image
Flexsteel Industries
Price$38.47
Change-$2.10 (-5.18%)
Volume$53K
Capitalization202.97M
Hooker Furnishings
Price$8.75
Change-$0.25 (-2.78%)
Volume$34.52K
Capitalization94.06M
FLXS vs HOFT Comparison Chart in %
FLXS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLXS vs. HOFT commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLXS is a Hold and HOFT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FLXS: $38.47 vs. HOFT: $8.75)
Brand notoriety: FLXS and HOFT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Home Furnishings industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLXS: 150% vs. HOFT: 74%
Market capitalization -- FLXS: $202.97M vs. HOFT: $94.06M
FLXS [@Home Furnishings] is valued at $202.97M. HOFT’s [@Home Furnishings] market capitalization is $94.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Furnishings] industry ranges from $31.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Furnishings] industry is $3.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLXS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHOFT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLXS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HOFT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HOFT is a better buy in the long-term than FLXS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLXS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOFT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLXS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HOFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HOFT is a better buy in the short-term than FLXS.

Price Growth

FLXS (@Home Furnishings) experienced а -6.33% price change this week, while HOFT (@Home Furnishings) price change was -2.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLXS is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2025.

HOFT is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Furnishings (-0.38% weekly)

The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLXS($203M) has a higher market cap than HOFT($94.1M). HOFT has higher P/E ratio than FLXS: HOFT (128.00) vs FLXS (10.84). FLXS YTD gains are higher at: -28.215 vs. HOFT (-33.492). FLXS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.7M vs. HOFT (-7.71M). FLXS has more cash in the bank: 6.53M vs. HOFT (821K). HOFT has less debt than FLXS: HOFT (50.1M) vs FLXS (59.4M). FLXS has higher revenues than HOFT: FLXS (441M) vs HOFT (376M).
FLXSHOFTFLXS / HOFT
Capitalization203M94.1M216%
EBITDA30.7M-7.71M-398%
Gain YTD-28.215-33.49284%
P/E Ratio10.84128.008%
Revenue441M376M117%
Total Cash6.53M821K795%
Total Debt59.4M50.1M119%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLXS vs HOFT: Fundamental Ratings
FLXS
HOFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6071
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66100
SMR RATING
1..100
6195
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6265
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
952
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HOFT's Valuation (7) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as FLXS (33). This means that HOFT’s stock grew similarly to FLXS’s over the last 12 months.

FLXS's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Home Furnishings industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HOFT (100). This means that FLXS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HOFT’s over the last 12 months.

FLXS's SMR Rating (61) in the Home Furnishings industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HOFT (95). This means that FLXS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HOFT’s over the last 12 months.

FLXS's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as HOFT (65). This means that FLXS’s stock grew similarly to HOFT’s over the last 12 months.

HOFT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Home Furnishings industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLXS (95). This means that HOFT’s stock grew significantly faster than FLXS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLXSHOFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLXS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HOFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEFOF5.340.02
+0.30%
Telefonica S.A.
SOMMY15.200.02
+0.14%
Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.
MFBI11.90N/A
N/A
Monroe Federal Bancorp, Inc.
JDWPF9.47N/A
N/A
J.D. Wetherspoon PLC
CRECF0.34-0.02
-5.68%
Critical Elements Lithium Corporation

FLXS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLXS has been loosely correlated with LZB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLXS jumps, then LZB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLXS
1D Price
Change %
FLXS100%
-5.18%
LZB - FLXS
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
ETD - FLXS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
HOFT - FLXS
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.78%
HNI - FLXS
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
MLKN - FLXS
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
More

HOFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HOFT has been loosely correlated with ETD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HOFT jumps, then ETD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOFT
1D Price
Change %
HOFT100%
-2.78%
ETD - HOFT
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
MLKN - HOFT
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
LZB - HOFT
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
LEG - HOFT
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
MBC - HOFT
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
More