FLWS
Price
$5.16
Change
+$0.01 (+0.19%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
698.5M
37 days until earnings call
RH
Price
$202.97
Change
+$8.30 (+4.26%)
Updated
Jul 22, 10:41 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.38B
44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLWS vs RH

Header iconFLWS vs RH Comparison
Open Charts FLWS vs RHBanner chart's image
1-800-FLOWERS.COM
Price$5.16
Change+$0.01 (+0.19%)
Volume$382.41K
Capitalization698.5M
RH
Price$202.97
Change+$8.30 (+4.26%)
Volume$3.31K
Capitalization6.38B
FLWS vs RH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLWS vs. RH commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLWS is a Hold and RH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (FLWS: $5.16 vs. RH: $194.67)
Brand notoriety: FLWS and RH are both notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLWS: 72% vs. RH: 56%
Market capitalization -- FLWS: $698.5M vs. RH: $6.38B
FLWS [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $698.5M. RH’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $6.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLWS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FLWS and RH are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLWS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLWS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLWS is a better buy in the short-term than RH.

Price Growth

FLWS (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -8.19% price change this week, while RH (@Specialty Stores) price change was -4.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLWS is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

RH is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.88% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RH($6.38B) has a higher market cap than FLWS($699M). FLWS has higher P/E ratio than RH: FLWS (156.25) vs RH (56.64). FLWS YTD gains are higher at: -36.842 vs. RH (-50.540). RH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 524M vs. FLWS (1.43M). FLWS has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. RH (124M). FLWS has less debt than RH: FLWS (318M) vs RH (3.72B). RH has higher revenues than FLWS: RH (3.03B) vs FLWS (1.91B).
FLWSRHFLWS / RH
Capitalization699M6.38B11%
EBITDA1.43M524M0%
Gain YTD-36.842-50.54073%
P/E Ratio156.2556.64276%
Revenue1.91B3.03B63%
Total Cash312M124M252%
Total Debt318M3.72B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLWS vs RH: Fundamental Ratings
FLWS
RH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8412
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9718
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9795
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
284
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RH's Valuation (73) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FLWS (83) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RH’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

RH's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FLWS (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RH’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

RH's SMR Rating (18) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLWS (97) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RH’s stock grew significantly faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

RH's Price Growth Rating (95) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FLWS (97) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RH’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

FLWS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Internet Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for RH (84) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that FLWS’s stock grew significantly faster than RH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLWSRH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARVIX12.450.07
+0.57%
ARGA International Value Institutional
RWMAX63.520.03
+0.05%
American Funds Washington Mutual R1
FCVIX20.51N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value I
MBNAX31.16-0.06
-0.19%
NYLI Balanced Class A
PMFPX23.44-0.15
-0.64%
Principal MidCap S&P 400 Index R5

FLWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLWS has been loosely correlated with RH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLWS jumps, then RH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLWS
1D Price
Change %
FLWS100%
+0.19%
RH - FLWS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
RUSHA - FLWS
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
DKS - FLWS
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
ARHS - FLWS
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
ASO - FLWS
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
More

RH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RH has been closely correlated with WSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RH jumps, then WSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RH
1D Price
Change %
RH100%
-0.42%
WSM - RH
66%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
FND - RH
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
ASO - RH
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
FIVE - RH
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
DKS - RH
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.84%
More