FLWS
Price
$4.86
Change
-$0.93 (-16.06%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
698.5M
110 days until earnings call
RH
Price
$194.28
Change
-$2.32 (-1.18%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
6.38B
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLWS vs RH

Header iconFLWS vs RH Comparison
Open Charts FLWS vs RHBanner chart's image
1-800-FLOWERS.COM
Price$4.86
Change-$0.93 (-16.06%)
Volume$2.83M
Capitalization698.5M
RH
Price$194.28
Change-$2.32 (-1.18%)
Volume$889.97K
Capitalization6.38B
FLWS vs RH Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLWS vs. RH commentary
May 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLWS is a Buy and RH is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 10, 2025
Stock price -- (FLWS: $4.86 vs. RH: $194.28)
Brand notoriety: FLWS and RH are both notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLWS: 406% vs. RH: 44%
Market capitalization -- FLWS: $698.5M vs. RH: $6.38B
FLWS [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $698.5M. RH’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $6.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLWS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RH is a better buy in the long-term than FLWS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLWS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLWS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RH is a better buy in the short-term than FLWS.

Price Growth

FLWS (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -13.21% price change this week, while RH (@Specialty Stores) price change was -1.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +3.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLWS is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

RH is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+3.38% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RH($6.38B) has a higher market cap than FLWS($699M). FLWS has higher P/E ratio than RH: FLWS (156.25) vs RH (56.64). FLWS YTD gains are higher at: -40.514 vs. RH (-50.639). RH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 524M vs. FLWS (1.43M). FLWS has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. RH (124M). FLWS has less debt than RH: FLWS (318M) vs RH (3.72B). RH has higher revenues than FLWS: RH (3.03B) vs FLWS (1.91B).
FLWSRHFLWS / RH
Capitalization699M6.38B11%
EBITDA1.43M524M0%
Gain YTD-40.514-50.63980%
P/E Ratio156.2556.64276%
Revenue1.91B3.03B63%
Total Cash312M124M252%
Total Debt318M3.72B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLWS vs RH: Fundamental Ratings
FLWS
RH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1214
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10086
SMR RATING
1..100
9119
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
240
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RH's Valuation (74) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FLWS (86) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RH’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

RH's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FLWS (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RH’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

RH's SMR Rating (19) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLWS (91) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RH’s stock grew significantly faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

RH's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FLWS (63) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that RH’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

FLWS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Internet Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RH (40) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that FLWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than RH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLWSRH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA298.2613.44
+4.72%
Tesla
GME27.540.76
+2.84%
GameStop Corp
AAPL198.531.04
+0.53%
Apple
SPY564.34-0.72
-0.13%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X102970.850000-270.609380
-0.26%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

FLWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLWS has been loosely correlated with RH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLWS jumps, then RH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLWS
1D Price
Change %
FLWS100%
-16.06%
RH - FLWS
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
ARHS - FLWS
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
GPI - FLWS
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
RUSHA - FLWS
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
PAG - FLWS
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
More

RH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RH has been loosely correlated with FND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RH jumps, then FND could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RH
1D Price
Change %
RH100%
-1.18%
FND - RH
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
WSM - RH
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
ASO - RH
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.58%
CWH - RH
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
FIVE - RH
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
More