FLWS
Price
$5.01
Change
-$0.02 (-0.40%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
698.5M
81 days until earnings call
PAG
Price
$164.78
Change
+$2.11 (+1.30%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
10.86B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLWS vs PAG

Header iconFLWS vs PAG Comparison
Open Charts FLWS vs PAGBanner chart's image
1-800-FLOWERS.COM
Price$5.01
Change-$0.02 (-0.40%)
Volume$362.55K
Capitalization698.5M
Penske Automotive Group
Price$164.78
Change+$2.11 (+1.30%)
Volume$293.23K
Capitalization10.86B
FLWS vs PAG Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLWS vs. PAG commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLWS is a Buy and PAG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FLWS: $4.79 vs. PAG: $163.14)
Brand notoriety: FLWS: Notable vs. PAG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLWS: 84% vs. PAG: 48%
Market capitalization -- FLWS: $698.5M vs. PAG: $10.86B
FLWS [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $698.5M. PAG’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $10.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLWS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PAG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than FLWS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLWS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLWS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the short-term than FLWS.

Price Growth

FLWS (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +6.68% price change this week, while PAG (@Specialty Stores) price change was +1.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLWS is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

PAG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+0.34% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($10.9B) has a higher market cap than FLWS($699M). FLWS has higher P/E ratio than PAG: FLWS (156.25) vs PAG (10.37). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 8.668 vs. FLWS (-41.371). PAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.79B vs. FLWS (1.43M). FLWS has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. PAG (96.4M). FLWS has less debt than PAG: FLWS (318M) vs PAG (7.74B). PAG has higher revenues than FLWS: PAG (29.5B) vs FLWS (1.91B).
FLWSPAGFLWS / PAG
Capitalization699M10.9B6%
EBITDA1.43M1.79B0%
Gain YTD-41.3718.668-477%
P/E Ratio156.2510.371,507%
Revenue1.91B29.5B6%
Total Cash312M96.4M324%
Total Debt318M7.74B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLWS vs PAG: Fundamental Ratings
FLWS
PAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
127
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005
SMR RATING
1..100
9148
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9151
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
239
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAG's Valuation (58) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FLWS (84) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLWS (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew significantly faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's SMR Rating (48) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (91) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (91) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

FLWS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Internet Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAG (39) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that FLWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLWSPAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

FLWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLWS has been loosely correlated with RH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLWS jumps, then RH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLWS
1D Price
Change %
FLWS100%
+1.05%
RH - FLWS
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.27%
RUSHA - FLWS
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.28%
GPI - FLWS
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.52%
PAG - FLWS
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
SAH - FLWS
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
More

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with ABG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then ABG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
-0.63%
ABG - PAG
79%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
GPI - PAG
78%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
AN - PAG
77%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
LAD - PAG
70%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
SAH - PAG
69%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
More