FLWS
Price
$5.15
Change
-$0.24 (-4.45%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
698.5M
38 days until earnings call
LIVE
Price
$13.43
Change
-$1.28 (-8.70%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
85.21M
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLWS vs LIVE

Header iconFLWS vs LIVE Comparison
Open Charts FLWS vs LIVEBanner chart's image
1-800-FLOWERS.COM
Price$5.15
Change-$0.24 (-4.45%)
Volume$363.28K
Capitalization698.5M
Live Ventures
Price$13.43
Change-$1.28 (-8.70%)
Volume$12.72K
Capitalization85.21M
FLWS vs LIVE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIVE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLWS vs. LIVE commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLWS is a Hold and LIVE is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (FLWS: $5.15 vs. LIVE: $14.71)
Brand notoriety: FLWS: Notable vs. LIVE: Not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLWS: 62% vs. LIVE: 22%
Market capitalization -- FLWS: $698.5M vs. LIVE: $85.21M
FLWS [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $698.5M. LIVE’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $85.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLWS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIVE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LIVE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIVE is a better buy in the long-term than FLWS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLWS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIVE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLWS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LIVE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLWS is a better buy in the short-term than LIVE.

Price Growth

FLWS (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -8.36% price change this week, while LIVE (@Specialty Stores) price change was -1.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLWS is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

LIVE is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.18% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLWS($699M) has a higher market cap than LIVE($85.2M). FLWS has higher P/E ratio than LIVE: FLWS (156.25) vs LIVE (21.28). LIVE YTD gains are higher at: 57.663 vs. FLWS (-36.965). LIVE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 34.3M vs. FLWS (1.43M). FLWS has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. LIVE (5.57M). LIVE has less debt than FLWS: LIVE (255M) vs FLWS (318M). FLWS has higher revenues than LIVE: FLWS (1.91B) vs LIVE (404M).
FLWSLIVEFLWS / LIVE
Capitalization699M85.2M820%
EBITDA1.43M34.3M4%
Gain YTD-36.96557.663-64%
P/E Ratio156.2521.28734%
Revenue1.91B404M472%
Total Cash312M5.57M5,602%
Total Debt318M255M125%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLWS vs LIVE: Fundamental Ratings
FLWS
LIVE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8995
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10092
SMR RATING
1..100
9792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8542
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LIVE's Valuation (50) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (83) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that LIVE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

LIVE's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FLWS (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that LIVE’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

LIVE's SMR Rating (92) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FLWS (97) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that LIVE’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

LIVE's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (85) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that LIVE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

LIVE's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FLWS (2) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that LIVE’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLWSLIVE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIVE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HAWLL13.350.15
+1.14%
Hawaiian Electric Co., Inc.
KREVF0.73N/A
N/A
Keppel REIT
CDGXF0.03N/A
N/A
China Dongxiang Group Co., Ltd.
FBPI9.26N/A
N/A
First Bancorp of Indiana, Inc.
GMVHY12.70-0.07
-0.59%
ENTAIN PLC

FLWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLWS has been loosely correlated with RH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLWS jumps, then RH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLWS
1D Price
Change %
FLWS100%
-4.45%
RH - FLWS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
RUSHA - FLWS
50%
Loosely correlated
-3.76%
DKS - FLWS
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
ARHS - FLWS
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
ASO - FLWS
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
More

LIVE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LIVE and EYE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LIVE and EYE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIVE
1D Price
Change %
LIVE100%
N/A
EYE - LIVE
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLWS - LIVE
15%
Poorly correlated
-4.45%
KIRK - LIVE
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HD - LIVE
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
AZO - LIVE
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
More