FLTLF
Price
$32.78
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
814.57M
STGC
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLTLF vs STGC

Header iconFLTLF vs STGC Comparison
Open Charts FLTLF vs STGCBanner chart's image
FLOW TRADERS
Price$32.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$101
Capitalization814.57M
STARTENGINE CROWDFUNDING
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$42.54K
CapitalizationN/A
FLTLF vs STGC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLTLF vs. STGC commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLTLF is a Hold and STGC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FLTLF: $32.78 vs. STGC: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: FLTLF and STGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLTLF: 3% vs. STGC: 100%
Market capitalization -- FLTLF: $814.57M vs. STGC: $0
FLTLF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $814.57M. STGC’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLTLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTGC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLTLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLTLF is a better buy in the long-term than STGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLTLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FLTLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FLTLF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.54% price change this week, while STGC (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +24.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+24.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLTLF YTD gains are higher at: 45.152 vs. STGC (0.000). FLTLF has higher revenues than STGC: FLTLF (484M) vs STGC (21.8M).
FLTLFSTGCFLTLF / STGC
Capitalization815MN/A-
EBITDAN/A-8.63M-
Gain YTD45.1520.000-
P/E Ratio13.11N/A-
Revenue484M21.8M2,220%
Total CashN/A13.8M-
Total Debt2.58BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLTLF: Fundamental Ratings
FLTLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLTLFSTGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
5%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLRRX12.230.15
+1.24%
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Class R1
AQLGX17.500.16
+0.92%
Alta Quality Growth Institutional
SINOX39.020.26
+0.67%
ClearBridge Large Cap Value C
TSFYX15.210.10
+0.66%
Touchstone Small Cap Y
PORTX60.890.36
+0.59%
Trillium ESG Global Equity Investor

FLTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLTLF and STGC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLTLF and STGC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLTLF
1D Price
Change %
FLTLF100%
N/A
STGC - FLTLF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OPY - FLTLF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
DPXCF - FLTLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EUXTF - FLTLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNNTF - FLTLF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

STGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STGC and FLTLF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STGC and FLTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STGC
1D Price
Change %
STGC100%
N/A
FLTLF - STGC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NRSCF - STGC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBTTF - STGC
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
CYFRF - STGC
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
AVFCF - STGC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More