FLTLF
Price
$27.27
Change
+$0.10 (+0.37%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OPY
Price
$68.38
Change
-$1.32 (-1.89%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
719.4M
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLTLF vs OPY

Header iconFLTLF vs OPY Comparison
Open Charts FLTLF vs OPYBanner chart's image
FLOW TRADERS
Price$27.27
Change+$0.10 (+0.37%)
Volume$1.83K
Capitalization1.16B
Oppenheimer Holdings
Price$68.38
Change-$1.32 (-1.89%)
Volume$28.83K
Capitalization719.4M
FLTLF vs OPY Comparison Chart in %
FLTLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLTLF vs. OPY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLTLF is a Hold and OPY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FLTLF: $27.27 vs. OPY: $68.38)
Brand notoriety: FLTLF and OPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLTLF: 100% vs. OPY: 61%
Market capitalization -- FLTLF: $1.16B vs. OPY: $719.4M
FLTLF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $1.16B. OPY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $719.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLTLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLTLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OPY is a better buy in the long-term than FLTLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLTLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OPY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLTLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLTLF is a better buy in the short-term than OPY.

Price Growth

FLTLF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.44% price change this week, while OPY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

OPY is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.68% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLTLF($1.16B) has a higher market cap than OPY($719M). OPY has higher P/E ratio than FLTLF: OPY (9.18) vs FLTLF (5.59). FLTLF YTD gains are higher at: 20.753 vs. OPY (9.657). OPY has less debt than FLTLF: OPY (926M) vs FLTLF (3.1B). OPY has higher revenues than FLTLF: OPY (1.49B) vs FLTLF (706M).
FLTLFOPYFLTLF / OPY
Capitalization1.16B719M162%
EBITDAN/A253M-
Gain YTD20.7539.657215%
P/E Ratio5.599.1861%
Revenue706M1.49B47%
Total CashN/A37.6M-
Total Debt3.1B926M335%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLTLF vs OPY: Fundamental Ratings
FLTLF
OPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8524
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10022
SMR RATING
1..100
8169
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9642
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OPY's Valuation (30) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FLTLF (32) in the null industry. This means that OPY’s stock grew similarly to FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

OPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLTLF (100) in the null industry. This means that OPY’s stock grew significantly faster than FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

OPY's SMR Rating (69) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FLTLF (81) in the null industry. This means that OPY’s stock grew similarly to FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

OPY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FLTLF (61) in the null industry. This means that OPY’s stock grew similarly to FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

OPY's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLTLF (96) in the null industry. This means that OPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLTLFOPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLTLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FALAX58.75N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap A
HDQVX18.73-0.16
-0.85%
Janus Henderson International Div S
FCIRX17.74-0.17
-0.95%
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl A
PRSVX55.40-1.03
-1.83%
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value
WCMNX13.05-0.44
-3.26%
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor

FLTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLTLF and OPY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLTLF and OPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLTLF
1D Price
Change %
FLTLF100%
+0.37%
OPY - FLTLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
HKXCY - FLTLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
ABIT - FLTLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-11.73%
EUXTF - FLTLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNNTF - FLTLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OPY has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OPY jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPY
1D Price
Change %
OPY100%
+0.20%
SF - OPY
68%
Closely correlated
+2.07%
MS - OPY
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.05%
GS - OPY
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.54%
EVR - OPY
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
JEF - OPY
64%
Loosely correlated
+5.54%
More