FLTLF
Price
$29.38
Change
-$0.37 (-1.24%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.26B
OPY
Price
$74.28
Change
+$1.54 (+2.12%)
Updated
Sep 8, 01:20 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
765.26M
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLTLF vs OPY

Header iconFLTLF vs OPY Comparison
Open Charts FLTLF vs OPYBanner chart's image
FLOW TRADERS
Price$29.38
Change-$0.37 (-1.24%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.26B
Oppenheimer Holdings
Price$74.28
Change+$1.54 (+2.12%)
Volume$100
Capitalization765.26M
FLTLF vs OPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLTLF vs. OPY commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLTLF is a Hold and OPY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FLTLF: $29.38 vs. OPY: $72.74)
Brand notoriety: FLTLF and OPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLTLF: 11% vs. OPY: 96%
Market capitalization -- FLTLF: $1.26B vs. OPY: $765.26M
FLTLF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $1.26B. OPY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $765.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLTLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLTLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OPY is a better buy in the long-term than FLTLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLTLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLTLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLTLF is a better buy in the short-term than OPY.

Price Growth

FLTLF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.93% price change this week, while OPY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +0.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +11.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

OPY is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+11.86% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLTLF($1.26B) has a higher market cap than OPY($765M). OPY has higher P/E ratio than FLTLF: OPY (9.43) vs FLTLF (5.99). FLTLF YTD gains are higher at: 30.097 vs. OPY (14.440). OPY has less debt than FLTLF: OPY (926M) vs FLTLF (3.1B).
FLTLFOPYFLTLF / OPY
Capitalization1.26B765M164%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD30.09714.440208%
P/E Ratio5.999.4363%
Revenue706MN/A-
Total CashN/A28.8M-
Total Debt3.1B926M335%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLTLF vs OPY: Fundamental Ratings
FLTLF
OPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8318
SMR RATING
1..100
8270
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5347
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9351
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OPY's Valuation (30) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FLTLF (32) in the null industry. This means that OPY’s stock grew similarly to FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

OPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLTLF (83) in the null industry. This means that OPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

OPY's SMR Rating (70) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FLTLF (82) in the null industry. This means that OPY’s stock grew similarly to FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

OPY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FLTLF (53) in the null industry. This means that OPY’s stock grew similarly to FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

OPY's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLTLF (93) in the null industry. This means that OPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLTLFOPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AGSCX6.500.08
+1.25%
Alger Small Cap Growth C
FDFIX27.70-0.09
-0.32%
Fidelity Flex 500 Index
RYDHX107.57-0.53
-0.49%
Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average® H
NQVCX55.59-0.31
-0.55%
Nuveen Multi Cap Value C
FAMVX105.02-0.67
-0.63%
FAM Value Investor

FLTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLTLF and STGC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLTLF and STGC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLTLF
1D Price
Change %
FLTLF100%
-1.24%
STGC - FLTLF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OPY - FLTLF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
DPXCF - FLTLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EUXTF - FLTLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNNTF - FLTLF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.04%
More

OPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OPY has been loosely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OPY jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPY
1D Price
Change %
OPY100%
-2.28%
SF - OPY
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.71%
EVR - OPY
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
MS - OPY
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
LAZ - OPY
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
JEF - OPY
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.26%
More