FLTLF
Price
$30.29
Change
+$0.48 (+1.61%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.27B
HKXCY
Price
$55.34
Change
+$0.84 (+1.54%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
67.3B
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLTLF vs HKXCY

Header iconFLTLF vs HKXCY Comparison
Open Charts FLTLF vs HKXCYBanner chart's image
FLOW TRADERS
Price$30.29
Change+$0.48 (+1.61%)
Volume$3.47K
Capitalization1.27B
Hong Kong Exchange & Clearing
Price$55.34
Change+$0.84 (+1.54%)
Volume$124.53K
Capitalization67.3B
FLTLF vs HKXCY Comparison Chart in %
FLTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLTLF vs. HKXCY commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLTLF is a Hold and HKXCY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FLTLF: $30.28 vs. HKXCY: $55.34)
Brand notoriety: FLTLF and HKXCY are both not notable
FLTLF represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while HKXCY is part of the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLTLF: 255% vs. HKXCY: 179%
Market capitalization -- FLTLF: $1.27B vs. HKXCY: $67.3B
FLTLF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $1.27B. HKXCY’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $67.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $144.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.72B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLTLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHKXCY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLTLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HKXCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HKXCY is a better buy in the long-term than FLTLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLTLF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HKXCY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLTLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HKXCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLTLF is a better buy in the short-term than HKXCY.

Price Growth

FLTLF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while HKXCY (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +2.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +84.90%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

HKXCY is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.26% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Financial Publishing/Services (-1.05% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HKXCY($67.3B) has a higher market cap than FLTLF($1.27B). HKXCY has higher P/E ratio than FLTLF: HKXCY (35.33) vs FLTLF (6.18). HKXCY YTD gains are higher at: 51.519 vs. FLTLF (34.104). HKXCY has higher revenues than FLTLF: HKXCY (20.3B) vs FLTLF (706M).
FLTLFHKXCYFLTLF / HKXCY
Capitalization1.27B67.3B2%
EBITDAN/A24.5B-
Gain YTD34.10451.51966%
P/E Ratio6.1835.3317%
Revenue706M20.3B3%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.1BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLTLF vs HKXCY: Fundamental Ratings
FLTLF
HKXCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9060
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8772
SMR RATING
1..100
8234
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5649
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9540
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HKXCY's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as FLTLF (31). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as FLTLF (87). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLTLF (82). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as FLTLF (56). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew similarly to FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

HKXCY's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLTLF (95). This means that HKXCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLTLFHKXCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HKXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LZFOX8.720.08
+0.93%
Lazard Equity Franchise Open Shares
CGRCX31.090.19
+0.61%
Invesco Comstock Select C
GLIFX18.150.09
+0.50%
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Inst
PSLCX10.72-0.01
-0.09%
Putnam Small Cap Value C
RDWFX13.71-0.08
-0.58%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc R5

FLTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLTLF and OPY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLTLF and OPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLTLF
1D Price
Change %
FLTLF100%
+1.63%
OPY - FLTLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
HKXCY - FLTLF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
ABIT - FLTLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.52%
EUXTF - FLTLF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
FNNTF - FLTLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HKXCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKXCY has been loosely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKXCY jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKXCY
1D Price
Change %
HKXCY100%
+1.54%
FUTU - HKXCY
64%
Loosely correlated
+4.43%
TIGR - HKXCY
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.24%
HKXCF - HKXCY
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.57%
TOP - HKXCY
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.20%
MQBKY - HKXCY
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
More