FLTLF
Price
$32.78
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
814.57M
FNNTF
Price
$27.37
Change
+$12.22 (+80.66%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.09B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLTLF vs FNNTF

Header iconFLTLF vs FNNTF Comparison
Open Charts FLTLF vs FNNTFBanner chart's image
FLOW TRADERS
Price$32.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$101
Capitalization814.57M
FLATEXDEGIRO AG
Price$27.37
Change+$12.22 (+80.66%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.09B
FLTLF vs FNNTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLTLF vs. FNNTF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLTLF is a Hold and FNNTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FLTLF: $32.78 vs. FNNTF: $27.37)
Brand notoriety: FLTLF and FNNTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLTLF: 3% vs. FNNTF: 18%
Market capitalization -- FLTLF: $814.57M vs. FNNTF: $1.09B
FLTLF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $814.57M. FNNTF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLTLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFNNTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLTLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FNNTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNNTF is a better buy in the long-term than FLTLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLTLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNNTF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLTLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FNNTF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLTLF is a better buy in the short-term than FNNTF.

Price Growth

FLTLF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.54% price change this week, while FNNTF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +24.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+24.10% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNNTF($1.09B) has a higher market cap than FLTLF($815M). FLTLF has higher P/E ratio than FNNTF: FLTLF (13.11) vs FNNTF (8.03). FNNTF YTD gains are higher at: 80.660 vs. FLTLF (45.152). FNNTF has less debt than FLTLF: FNNTF (34.4M) vs FLTLF (2.58B). FLTLF has higher revenues than FNNTF: FLTLF (484M) vs FNNTF (401M).
FLTLFFNNTFFLTLF / FNNTF
Capitalization815M1.09B75%
EBITDAN/A150M-
Gain YTD45.15280.66056%
P/E Ratio13.118.03163%
Revenue484M401M121%
Total CashN/A2.12B-
Total Debt2.58B34.4M7,494%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLTLF vs FNNTF: Fundamental Ratings
FLTLF
FNNTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7380
SMR RATING
1..100
9455
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4335
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9815
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLTLF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNNTF (90). This means that FLTLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNNTF’s over the last 12 months.

FLTLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as FNNTF (80). This means that FLTLF’s stock grew similarly to FNNTF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNTF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLTLF (94). This means that FNNTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNTF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as FLTLF (43). This means that FNNTF’s stock grew similarly to FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNTF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLTLF (98). This means that FNNTF’s stock grew significantly faster than FLTLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLTLFFNNTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSMLX26.820.25
+0.94%
Franklin Small Cap Growth R6
MOINX24.480.21
+0.87%
NYLI WMC Small Companies Investor Class
AGVGX26.540.13
+0.49%
American Funds Global Insight F-2
NMFIX13.510.01
+0.07%
Northern Multi-Mgr Glbl Listed Infra
HRLIX9.35-0.01
-0.11%
Hartford Real Asset I

FLTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLTLF and STGC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLTLF and STGC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLTLF
1D Price
Change %
FLTLF100%
N/A
STGC - FLTLF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OPY - FLTLF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
DPXCF - FLTLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EUXTF - FLTLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNNTF - FLTLF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FNNTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNNTF has been loosely correlated with SRL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNNTF jumps, then SRL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNTF
1D Price
Change %
FNNTF100%
N/A
SRL - FNNTF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FLTLF - FNNTF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIHG - FNNTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPXCF - FNNTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABIT - FNNTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+17.03%
More