Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLSPX vs NLSCX
FLSPX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts FLSPX vs NLSCX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.83
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
FLSPX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLSPX vs. NLSCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLSPX is a StrongBuy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8B vs. FLSPX (249M). FLSPX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: FLSPX (0.32) vs NLSCX (0.00). FLSPX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: FLSPX (11 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FLSPX (1.87). FLSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 260.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLSPX: NLSCX (1000) vs FLSPX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.13 vs. FLSPX (2.69). FLSPX return over 5 years is better than : 36.39 vs. NLSCX (15.78).
| FLSPX | NLSCX | FLSPX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 2.43 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 2.43 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.741 | 6.614 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 249M | 8B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.69 | 6.13 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.90 | 17.00 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.39 | 15.78 | 231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.79 | 45.22 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement