FLS
Price
$70.90
Change
+$0.94 (+1.34%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
9.01B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XMTR
Price
$56.37
Change
-$0.45 (-0.79%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.83B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLS vs XMTR

Header iconFLS vs XMTR Comparison
Open Charts FLS vs XMTRBanner chart's image
Flowserve
Price$70.90
Change+$0.94 (+1.34%)
Volume$1.95M
Capitalization9.01B
Xometry
Price$56.37
Change-$0.45 (-0.79%)
Volume$471.07K
Capitalization2.83B
FLS vs XMTR Comparison Chart in %
FLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XMTR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLS vs. XMTR commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLS is a StrongBuy and XMTR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FLS: $69.96 vs. XMTR: $56.82)
Brand notoriety: FLS and XMTR are both not notable
FLS represents the Industrial Machinery, while XMTR is part of the Electronics Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLS: 19% vs. XMTR: 27%
Market capitalization -- FLS: $9.01B vs. XMTR: $2.89B
FLS [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $9.01B. XMTR’s [@Electronics Distributors] market capitalization is $2.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $206.99B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics Distributors] industry ranges from $50.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $14.49B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics Distributors] industry is $7.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXMTR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XMTR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the long-term than XMTR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XMTR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • XMTR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the short-term than XMTR.

Price Growth

FLS (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -0.48% price change this week, while XMTR (@Electronics Distributors) price change was -1.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.99%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLS is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

XMTR is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+0.29% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

@Electronics Distributors (+0.43% weekly)

Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLS($9.01B) has a higher market cap than XMTR($2.83B). XMTR YTD gains are higher at: 33.193 vs. FLS (23.123). FLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 557M vs. XMTR (-41.54M). XMTR has less debt than FLS: XMTR (335M) vs FLS (1.67B). FLS has higher revenues than XMTR: FLS (4.65B) vs XMTR (604M).
FLSXMTRFLS / XMTR
Capitalization9.01B2.83B319%
EBITDA557M-41.54M-1,341%
Gain YTD23.12333.19370%
P/E Ratio20.61N/A-
Revenue4.65B604M769%
Total CashN/A226M-
Total Debt1.67B335M498%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLS: Fundamental Ratings
FLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
57
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLSXMTR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XMTR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CADJPY111.530.42
+0.38%
Canadian Dollar - Japan Yen
VPLS78.530.10
+0.12%
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
PHYD52.400.05
+0.10%
Putnam ESG High Yield ETF
CNYHKD1.10-0.00
-0.03%
China Yuan - Hong Kong Dollar
XOMO11.53-0.07
-0.56%
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF

FLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLS
1D Price
Change %
FLS100%
-1.28%
ITT - FLS
78%
Closely correlated
-1.50%
CMI - FLS
71%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
FELE - FLS
69%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
ATMU - FLS
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
PH - FLS
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
More

XMTR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMTR has been loosely correlated with HLIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XMTR jumps, then HLIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XMTR
1D Price
Change %
XMTR100%
+2.97%
HLIO - XMTR
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
NPO - XMTR
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
ITT - XMTR
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
FLS - XMTR
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
EMR - XMTR
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
More