FLS
Price
$44.82
Change
+$0.20 (+0.45%)
Updated
Apr 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.99B
4 days until earnings call
RBC
Price
$327.13
Change
-$3.00 (-0.91%)
Updated
Apr 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.89B
27 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLS vs RBC

Header iconFLS vs RBC Comparison
Open Charts FLS vs RBCBanner chart's image
Flowserve
Price$44.82
Change+$0.20 (+0.45%)
Volume$9.23K
Capitalization5.99B
RBC Bearings
Price$327.13
Change-$3.00 (-0.91%)
Volume$1.03K
Capitalization7.89B
FLS vs RBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLS vs. RBC commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLS is a Hold and RBC is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FLS: $44.62 vs. RBC: $330.13)
Brand notoriety: FLS and RBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLS: 75% vs. RBC: 137%
Market capitalization -- FLS: $5.99B vs. RBC: $7.89B
FLS [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $5.99B. RBC’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $7.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBC is a better buy in the long-term than FLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the short-term than RBC.

Price Growth

FLS (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +6.93% price change this week, while RBC (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +2.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +2.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

RBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+2.39% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBC($7.89B) has a higher market cap than FLS($5.99B). RBC has higher P/E ratio than FLS: RBC (45.06) vs FLS (32.38). RBC YTD gains are higher at: 10.360 vs. FLS (-22.103). RBC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 442M vs. FLS (374M). FLS has more cash in the bank: 546M vs. RBC (71.6M). RBC has less debt than FLS: RBC (1.31B) vs FLS (1.41B). FLS has higher revenues than RBC: FLS (4.32B) vs RBC (1.54B).
FLSRBCFLS / RBC
Capitalization5.99B7.89B76%
EBITDA374M442M85%
Gain YTD-22.10310.360-213%
P/E Ratio32.3845.0672%
Revenue4.32B1.54B280%
Total Cash546M71.6M763%
Total Debt1.41B1.31B107%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLS vs RBC: Fundamental Ratings
FLS
RBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7068
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4311
SMR RATING
1..100
5678
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8837
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLS's Valuation (37) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as RBC (63) in the null industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to RBC’s over the last 12 months.

RBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as FLS (43) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RBC’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's SMR Rating (56) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as RBC (78) in the null industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to RBC’s over the last 12 months.

RBC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLS (85) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLS’s over the last 12 months.

RBC's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLS (88) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLSRBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA259.518.77
+3.50%
Tesla
SPY546.6911.27
+2.10%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL208.373.77
+1.84%
Apple
BTC.X93943.800000244.687500
+0.26%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.08-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp

FLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then PH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLS
1D Price
Change %
FLS100%
+5.43%
PH - FLS
79%
Closely correlated
+2.75%
DOV - FLS
79%
Closely correlated
+2.03%
EMR - FLS
78%
Closely correlated
+3.94%
ETN - FLS
74%
Closely correlated
+4.12%
NPO - FLS
74%
Closely correlated
+2.56%
More

RBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBC has been loosely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBC jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBC
1D Price
Change %
RBC100%
+1.43%
ITT - RBC
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.98%
NPO - RBC
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.56%
PH - RBC
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.75%
DOV - RBC
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.03%
FLS - RBC
59%
Loosely correlated
+5.43%
More