FLS vs RBC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLS is a Hold and RBC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- RBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FLS (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +8.53% price change this week, while RBC (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +6.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +3.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLS is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.
RBC is expected to report earnings on May 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (+3.04% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| FLS | RBC | FLS / RBC | |
| Capitalization | 5.99B | 7.89B | 76% |
| EBITDA | 374M | 442M | 85% |
| Gain YTD | 12.570 | 8.207 | 153% |
| P/E Ratio | 32.38 | 45.06 | 72% |
| Revenue | 4.32B | 1.54B | 280% |
| Total Cash | 546M | 71.6M | 763% |
| Total Debt | 1.41B | 1.31B | 107% |
FLS | RBC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 2 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 6 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RBC's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as FLS (65) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RBC’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.
RBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as FLS (43) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that RBC’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.
FLS's SMR Rating (59) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as RBC (78) in the null industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to RBC’s over the last 12 months.
FLS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as RBC (48) in the null industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to RBC’s over the last 12 months.
FLS's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as RBC (49) in the null industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to RBC’s over the last 12 months.
| FLS | RBC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 66% | 9 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 78% | 9 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 76% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 74% | 9 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 61% | 9 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 72% | 9 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 62% | 16 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 51% | 9 days ago 67% |
FLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.
RBC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBC has been loosely correlated with HLMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBC jumps, then HLMN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBC | 100% | +3.72% | ||
| HLMN - RBC | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.80% | ||
| MIDD - RBC | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| GTLS - RBC | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| GTES - RBC | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| FLS - RBC | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.97% | ||
More | ||||