FLS
Price
$71.53
Change
-$1.95 (-2.65%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
9.09B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HI
Price
$31.91
Change
+$0.06 (+0.19%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.25B
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLS vs HI

Header iconFLS vs HI Comparison
Open Charts FLS vs HIBanner chart's image
Flowserve
Price$71.53
Change-$1.95 (-2.65%)
Volume$1.5M
Capitalization9.09B
Hillenbrand
Price$31.91
Change+$0.06 (+0.19%)
Volume$651.25K
Capitalization2.25B
FLS vs HI Comparison Chart in %
FLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLS vs. HI commentary
Dec 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLS is a StrongBuy and HI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FLS: $73.48 vs. HI: $31.85)
Brand notoriety: FLS and HI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLS: 58% vs. HI: 30%
Market capitalization -- FLS: $9.09B vs. HI: $2.25B
FLS [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $9.09B. HI’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $2.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $218.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $15.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HI is a better buy in the long-term than FLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FLS and HI are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FLS (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +2.21% price change this week, while HI (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +0.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLS is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

HI is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+0.97% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLS($9.09B) has a higher market cap than HI($2.25B). HI has higher P/E ratio than FLS: HI (52.31) vs FLS (20.79). FLS YTD gains are higher at: 29.309 vs. HI (6.568). FLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 798M vs. HI (231M). FLS has more cash in the bank: 834M vs. HI (165M). HI (1.6B) and FLS (1.67B) have identical debt. FLS has higher revenues than HI: FLS (4.69B) vs HI (2.67B).
FLSHIFLS / HI
Capitalization9.09B2.25B404%
EBITDA798M231M345%
Gain YTD29.3096.568446%
P/E Ratio20.7952.3140%
Revenue4.69B2.67B175%
Total Cash834M165M505%
Total Debt1.67B1.6B104%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLS vs HI: Fundamental Ratings
FLS
HI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1825
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2695
SMR RATING
1..100
5790
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8145
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HI's Valuation (27) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLS (72) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that HI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLS’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Industrial Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for HI (95) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew significantly faster than HI’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's SMR Rating (57) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HI (90) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HI’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as HI (42) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to HI’s over the last 12 months.

HI's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLS (81) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that HI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLSHI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPWIX35.420.51
+1.46%
SEI Small Cap Growth I (SIMT)
PLIBX40.830.24
+0.59%
Plumb Balanced Institutional
PSIAX51.500.11
+0.21%
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index A
AGYWX70.97-0.11
-0.15%
American Century Growth Y
GSBUX27.54-0.25
-0.90%
Goldman Sachs Income Builder R6

FLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLS
1D Price
Change %
FLS100%
+0.05%
ITT - FLS
78%
Closely correlated
+1.76%
CMI - FLS
70%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
FELE - FLS
69%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
ATMU - FLS
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
PH - FLS
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
More

HI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HI has been closely correlated with LECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HI jumps, then LECO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HI
1D Price
Change %
HI100%
+0.06%
LECO - HI
67%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
TKR - HI
67%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
KMT - HI
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
PNR - HI
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
FELE - HI
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
More