FLS
Price
$70.90
Change
+$0.94 (+1.34%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
9.01B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GTLS
Price
$204.96
Change
+$0.75 (+0.37%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
9.21B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLS vs GTLS

Header iconFLS vs GTLS Comparison
Open Charts FLS vs GTLSBanner chart's image
Flowserve
Price$70.90
Change+$0.94 (+1.34%)
Volume$1.95M
Capitalization9.01B
Chart Industries
Price$204.96
Change+$0.75 (+0.37%)
Volume$518.41K
Capitalization9.21B
FLS vs GTLS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLS vs. GTLS commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLS is a StrongBuy and GTLS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FLS: $69.96 vs. GTLS: $204.40)
Brand notoriety: FLS and GTLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLS: 19% vs. GTLS: 21%
Market capitalization -- FLS: $9.01B vs. GTLS: $9.21B
FLS [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $9.01B. GTLS’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $9.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $206.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $14.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGTLS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GTLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTLS is a better buy in the long-term than FLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTLS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GTLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the short-term than GTLS.

Price Growth

FLS (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -0.48% price change this week, while GTLS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLS is expected to report earnings on Feb 24, 2026.

GTLS is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+0.29% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTLS($9.21B) and FLS($9.01B) have the same market capitalization . GTLS has higher P/E ratio than FLS: GTLS (232.91) vs FLS (20.61). FLS YTD gains are higher at: 23.123 vs. GTLS (7.103). GTLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 971M vs. FLS (557M). FLS has less debt than GTLS: FLS (1.67B) vs GTLS (3.67B). FLS has higher revenues than GTLS: FLS (4.65B) vs GTLS (4.25B).
FLSGTLSFLS / GTLS
Capitalization9.01B9.21B98%
EBITDA557M971M57%
Gain YTD23.1237.103326%
P/E Ratio20.61232.919%
Revenue4.65B4.25B109%
Total CashN/A342M-
Total Debt1.67B3.67B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLS vs GTLS: Fundamental Ratings
FLS
GTLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2650
SMR RATING
1..100
5776
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
813
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLS's Valuation (71) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GTLS (91). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to GTLS’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GTLS (50). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to GTLS’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's SMR Rating (57) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GTLS (76). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to GTLS’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GTLS (48). This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to GTLS’s over the last 12 months.

GTLS's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Industrial Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLS (81). This means that GTLS’s stock grew significantly faster than FLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLSGTLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GTLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOAT32.370.06
+0.17%
SonicShares™ Global Shipping ETF
DIVN26.600.03
+0.11%
Horizon Dividend Income ETF
BELT33.96N/A
N/A
iShares U.S. Select Equity Active ETF
BAB27.30-0.03
-0.11%
Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF
WOOD69.16-0.48
-0.69%
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF

FLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLS
1D Price
Change %
FLS100%
-1.28%
ITT - FLS
78%
Closely correlated
-1.50%
CMI - FLS
71%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
FELE - FLS
69%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
ATMU - FLS
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
PH - FLS
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
More

GTLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLS has been loosely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLS jumps, then PH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTLS
1D Price
Change %
GTLS100%
+0.17%
PH - GTLS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
GRC - GTLS
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GHM - GTLS
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
ETN - GTLS
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
FLS - GTLS
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
More