Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLRUX vs PACAX
FLRUX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts FLRUX vs PACAX
Meeder Conservative Allocation Retail
Price$24.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.88M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.24
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets604.53M
FLRUX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLRUX vs. PACAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLRUX is a Hold and PACAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 605M vs. FLRUX (163M). PACAX pays higher dividends than FLRUX: PACAX (3.80) vs FLRUX (2.59). FLRUX was incepted earlier than PACAX: FLRUX (31 years) vs PACAX (32 years). FLRUX (1.54) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. FLRUX (166.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLRUX: PACAX (0) vs FLRUX (2500). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. FLRUX (7.05). FLRUX return over 5 years is better than : 12.76 vs. PACAX (10.15).
| FLRUX | PACAX | FLRUX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.00 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.00 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.850 | 9.253 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163M | 605M | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.59 | 3.80 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.05 | 8.54 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.92 | 30.84 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.76 | 10.15 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.58 | 36.44 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers