FLRAF
Price
$1.24
Change
-$0.33 (-21.02%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
390.29M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FPLSF
Price
$19.73
Change
+$6.75 (+52.00%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.75B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLRAF vs FPLSF

Header iconFLRAF vs FPLSF Comparison
Open Charts FLRAF vs FPLSFBanner chart's image
Essentra
Price$1.24
Change-$0.33 (-21.02%)
Volume$510
Capitalization390.29M
5N Plus
Price$19.73
Change+$6.75 (+52.00%)
Volume$78.09K
Capitalization1.75B
FLRAF vs FPLSF Comparison Chart in %
FLRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FPLSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLRAF vs. FPLSF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLRAF is a Hold and FPLSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (FLRAF: $1.46 vs. FPLSF: $19.73)
Brand notoriety: FLRAF and FPLSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLRAF: 227% vs. FPLSF: 207%
Market capitalization -- FLRAF: $390.29M vs. FPLSF: $1.75B
FLRAF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $390.29M. FPLSF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $1.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $216.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLRAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFPLSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FPLSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPLSF is a better buy in the long-term than FLRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLRAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPLSF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLRAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • FPLSF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FPLSF is a better buy in the short-term than FLRAF.

Price Growth

FLRAF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FPLSF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +39.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+1.59% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPLSF($1.75B) has a higher market cap than FLRAF($390M). FPLSF has higher P/E ratio than FLRAF: FPLSF (40.26) vs FLRAF (33.37). FPLSF YTD gains are higher at: 49.432 vs. FLRAF (14.780). FPLSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 86.3M vs. FLRAF (46M). FPLSF has more cash in the bank: 52.2M vs. FLRAF (41.3M). FLRAF has less debt than FPLSF: FLRAF (137M) vs FPLSF (146M). FPLSF has higher revenues than FLRAF: FPLSF (360M) vs FLRAF (295M).
FLRAFFPLSFFLRAF / FPLSF
Capitalization390M1.75B22%
EBITDA46M86.3M53%
Gain YTD14.78049.43230%
P/E Ratio33.3740.2683%
Revenue295M360M82%
Total Cash41.3M52.2M79%
Total Debt137M146M94%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLRAF vs FPLSF: Fundamental Ratings
FLRAF
FPLSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4221
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1006
SMR RATING
1..100
8736
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4936
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10022
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLRAF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FPLSF (92). This means that FLRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FPLSF’s over the last 12 months.

FPLSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLRAF (100). This means that FPLSF’s stock grew significantly faster than FLRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FPLSF's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLRAF (87). This means that FPLSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FPLSF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FLRAF (49). This means that FPLSF’s stock grew similarly to FLRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FPLSF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLRAF (100). This means that FPLSF’s stock grew significantly faster than FLRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLRAFFPLSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FPLSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SEMCX27.820.08
+0.29%
SEI Mid-Cap F (SIMT)
BIERX29.240.05
+0.17%
Brandes International Equity R6
JFDRX13.75-0.05
-0.36%
JHancock Financial Industries R6
MCVCX9.88-0.08
-0.80%
Transamerica Mid Cap Value Opps C
JMGMX51.48-0.52
-1.00%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth R6

FLRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLRAF and EMNSF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLRAF and EMNSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLRAF
1D Price
Change %
FLRAF100%
N/A
EMNSF - FLRAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVKIF - FLRAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGPHF - FLRAF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.29%
FPLSF - FLRAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+5.71%
EVKIY - FLRAF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
More

FPLSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPLSF and EMNSF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPLSF and EMNSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPLSF
1D Price
Change %
FPLSF100%
+5.71%
EMNSF - FPLSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUPPF - FPLSF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVKIF - FPLSF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVKIY - FPLSF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
ELKEF - FPLSF
4%
Poorly correlated
+8.77%
More