FLR
Price
$52.76
Change
+$1.28 (+2.49%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
8.69B
25 days until earnings call
SHIM
Price
$1.94
Change
-$0.07 (-3.48%)
Updated
Jul 7, 12:26 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
69.19M
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLR vs SHIM

Header iconFLR vs SHIM Comparison
Open Charts FLR vs SHIMBanner chart's image
Fluor
Price$52.76
Change+$1.28 (+2.49%)
Volume$2.26M
Capitalization8.69B
Shimmick
Price$1.94
Change-$0.07 (-3.48%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization69.19M
FLR vs SHIM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLR vs. SHIM commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLR is a Buy and SHIM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FLR: $52.76 vs. SHIM: $2.01)
Brand notoriety: FLR and SHIM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLR: 56% vs. SHIM: 70%
Market capitalization -- FLR: $8.69B vs. SHIM: $69.19M
FLR [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $8.69B. SHIM’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $69.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSHIM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SHIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLR is a better buy in the long-term than SHIM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHIM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SHIM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHIM is a better buy in the short-term than FLR.

Price Growth

FLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +2.69% price change this week, while SHIM (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +16.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +28.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +307.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLR is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

SHIM is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.43% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLR($8.69B) has a higher market cap than SHIM($69.2M). FLR YTD gains are higher at: 6.975 vs. SHIM (-22.394). FLR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 748M vs. SHIM (-82.44M). FLR has more cash in the bank: 2.51B vs. SHIM (16.3M). SHIM has less debt than FLR: SHIM (47.7M) vs FLR (1.09B). FLR has higher revenues than SHIM: FLR (16.6B) vs SHIM (482M).
FLRSHIMFLR / SHIM
Capitalization8.69B69.2M12,555%
EBITDA748M-82.44M-907%
Gain YTD6.975-22.394-31%
P/E Ratio5.01N/A-
Revenue16.6B482M3,444%
Total Cash2.51B16.3M15,405%
Total Debt1.09B47.7M2,279%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLR: Fundamental Ratings
FLR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
30
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLRSHIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XCEM34.740.30
+0.87%
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF
EBIZ30.800.19
+0.62%
Global X E-commerce ETF
SMB17.280.01
+0.06%
VanEck Short Muni ETF
BBBL48.23-0.01
-0.02%
BondBloxx BBB Rated 10+ Yr Corp Bd ETF
CCSB20.38-0.09
-0.44%
Carbon Collective Short Dur Grn Bd ETF

FLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLR has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLR
1D Price
Change %
FLR100%
+2.49%
MTZ - FLR
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
FIX - FLR
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
EME - FLR
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
STRL - FLR
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.48%
PRIM - FLR
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.30%
More

SHIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHIM and FLR have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHIM and FLR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHIM
1D Price
Change %
SHIM100%
+4.15%
FLR - SHIM
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.49%
J - SHIM
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
CDLR - SHIM
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
FER - SHIM
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
PWR - SHIM
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.51%
More