FLR vs RTOBF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLR is a Hold and RTOBF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRTOBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FLR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RTOBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FLR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -13.80% price change this week, while RTOBF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+0.55% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| FLR | RTOBF | FLR / RTOBF | |
| Capitalization | 8.71B | 985M | 885% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 5.23B | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.691 | 5.748 | 517% |
| P/E Ratio | 35.03 | 12.35 | 284% |
| Revenue | N/A | 32.4B | - |
| Total Cash | 1.4B | 2.12B | 66% |
| Total Debt | 1.15B | 9.68B | 12% |
FLR | RTOBF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 46 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 77 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 39 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RTOBF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLR (83) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that RTOBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLR’s over the last 12 months.
FLR's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RTOBF (77) in the null industry. This means that FLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than RTOBF’s over the last 12 months.
RTOBF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as FLR (84) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that RTOBF’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.
FLR's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as RTOBF (49) in the null industry. This means that FLR’s stock grew similarly to RTOBF’s over the last 12 months.
RTOBF's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as FLR (90) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that RTOBF’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.
| FLR | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
FLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLR has been loosely correlated with AMRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLR jumps, then AMRC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLR | 100% | +0.93% | ||
| AMRC - FLR | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| BLD - FLR | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| ROAD - FLR | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| STN - FLR | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| APG - FLR | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
More | ||||
RTOBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RTOBF and FLR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTOBF and FLR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RTOBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTOBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FLR - RTOBF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
| SNCAF - RTOBF | 6% Poorly correlated | +15.83% | ||
| SHMUF - RTOBF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PNOCF - RTOBF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RELT - RTOBF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||