FLR
Price
$42.13
Change
-$0.27 (-0.64%)
Updated
Sep 26, 03:51 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.85B
35 days until earnings call
MTZ
Price
$204.40
Change
-$1.54 (-0.75%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
16.13B
34 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLR vs MTZ

Header iconFLR vs MTZ Comparison
Open Charts FLR vs MTZBanner chart's image
Fluor
Price$42.13
Change-$0.27 (-0.64%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization6.85B
MasTec
Price$204.40
Change-$1.54 (-0.75%)
Volume$1.1M
Capitalization16.13B
FLR vs MTZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLR vs. MTZ commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLR is a StrongBuy and MTZ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FLR: $42.40 vs. MTZ: $204.40)
Brand notoriety: FLR: Not notable vs. MTZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLR: 88% vs. MTZ: 110%
Market capitalization -- FLR: $6.85B vs. MTZ: $16.13B
FLR [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $6.85B. MTZ’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $16.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLR is a better buy in the long-term than MTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTZ is a better buy in the short-term than FLR.

Price Growth

FLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -0.05% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +2.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +346.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLR is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

MTZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+1.25% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTZ($16.1B) has a higher market cap than FLR($6.86B). MTZ has higher P/E ratio than FLR: MTZ (60.83) vs FLR (1.75). MTZ YTD gains are higher at: 50.228 vs. FLR (-14.031). MTZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 978M vs. FLR (525M). FLR has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. MTZ (191M). FLR has less debt than MTZ: FLR (1.07B) vs MTZ (2.67B). FLR has higher revenues than MTZ: FLR (16.3B) vs MTZ (13B).
FLRMTZFLR / MTZ
Capitalization6.86B16.1B43%
EBITDA525M978M54%
Gain YTD-14.03150.228-28%
P/E Ratio1.7560.833%
Revenue16.3B13B125%
Total Cash2.27B191M1,189%
Total Debt1.07B2.67B40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLR vs MTZ: Fundamental Ratings
FLR
MTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7514
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3919
SMR RATING
1..100
1373
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5539
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLR's Valuation (50) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (90). This means that FLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

MTZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (39). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.

FLR's SMR Rating (13) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (73). This means that FLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

MTZ's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (55). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.

MTZ's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (100). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLRMTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSFD11.020.08
+0.73%
Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X ETF
TDTT24.32-0.03
-0.10%
FlexShares iBoxx 3Yr Target Dur TIPS ETF
ZNOV26.32-0.03
-0.13%
Innovator Equity Defined Prt ETF -1YrNov
TMFG29.78-0.19
-0.65%
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
ONEO127.31-1.82
-1.41%
SPDR® Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF

FLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLR has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLR
1D Price
Change %
FLR100%
-3.09%
MTZ - FLR
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
ACM - FLR
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
PWR - FLR
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
GLDD - FLR
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.57%
AGX - FLR
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
More

MTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTZ
1D Price
Change %
MTZ100%
-0.69%
PWR - MTZ
84%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
EME - MTZ
84%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
FIX - MTZ
80%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
STRL - MTZ
77%
Closely correlated
-1.73%
PRIM - MTZ
77%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
More