Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLQS vs VTWO
FLQS vs VTWO Comparison
Open Charts FLQS vs VTWO
Franklin US Small Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
Price$42.16
Change-$0.60 (-1.40%)
Volume$102
Net Assets68.47M
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Price$95.74
Change-$2.74 (-2.78%)
Volume$41.79K
Net Assets13.89B
FLQS vs VTWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLQS vs. VTWO commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLQS is a Hold and VTWO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTWO has more net assets: 13.9B vs. FLQS (68.5M). VTWO has a higher annual dividend yield than FLQS: VTWO (10.717) vs FLQS (3.536). FLQS was incepted earlier than VTWO: FLQS (9 years) vs VTWO (15 years). VTWO (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than FLQS (0.35). FLQS has a higher turnover VTWO (12.00) vs VTWO (12.00).
| FLQS | VTWO | FLQS / VTWO | |
| Gain YTD | 3.536 | 10.717 | 33% |
| Net Assets | 68.5M | 13.9B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.07 | 500% |
| Turnover | 24.22 | 12.00 | 202% |
| Yield | 1.18 | 1.18 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLQS | VTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 77% | 10 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FLQS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLQS has been closely correlated with PATK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLQS jumps, then PATK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLQS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLQS | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| PATK - FLQS | 76% Closely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| JXN - FLQS | 75% Closely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| CVLG - FLQS | 72% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| VCTR - FLQS | 68% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| ACT - FLQS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
More | ||||
VTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VTWO has been closely correlated with SSD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VTWO jumps, then SSD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTWO | 100% | -0.26% | ||
| SSD - VTWO | 69% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| FIX - VTWO | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| LNW - VTWO | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.72% | ||
| ONTO - VTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| FN - VTWO | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
More | ||||