Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLQS vs SMMD
FLQS vs SMMD Comparison
Open Charts FLQS vs SMMD
Franklin US Small Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
Price$44.24
Change+$0.04 (+0.09%)
Volume$1.88K
Net Assets68.61M
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Price$73.60
Change+$0.44 (+0.60%)
Volume$54.45K
Net Assets1.66B
FLQS vs SMMD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLQS vs. SMMD commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLQS is a Buy and SMMD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMD has more net assets: 1.66B vs. FLQS (68.6M). SMMD has a higher annual dividend yield than FLQS: SMMD (8.921) vs FLQS (6.829). FLQS was incepted earlier than SMMD: FLQS (8 years) vs SMMD (8 years). SMMD (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FLQS (0.35). FLQS has a higher turnover SMMD (8.00) vs SMMD (8.00).
| FLQS | SMMD | FLQS / SMMD | |
| Gain YTD | 6.829 | 8.921 | 77% |
| Net Assets | 68.6M | 1.66B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.15 | 233% |
| Turnover | 24.22 | 8.00 | 303% |
| Yield | 1.24 | 1.28 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLQS | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLQS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLQS has been closely correlated with PATK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLQS jumps, then PATK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLQS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLQS | 100% | +0.08% | ||
| PATK - FLQS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| JXN - FLQS | 72% Closely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| CVLG - FLQS | 68% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| ACT - FLQS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| GNTY - FLQS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||
SMMD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMD has been loosely correlated with PHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMD jumps, then PHM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMMD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMMD | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| PHM - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| BLDR - SMMD | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.15% | ||
| PTC - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| ENTG - SMMD | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.93% | ||
| HUBB - SMMD | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
More | ||||