Earnings call today
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLQS vs PATK
FLQS vs PATK Comparison
Open Charts FLQS vs PATK
Franklin US Small Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
Price$41.28
Change-$0.03 (-0.07%)
Volume$200
Net Assets49.7M
Patrick Industries
Price$97.38
Change-$3.72 (-3.68%)
Volume$934
Capitalization2.67B
FLQS vs PATK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLQS vs. PATK commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLQS is a Hold and PATK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PATK: Fundamental Ratings
PATK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLQS | PATK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% | 10 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 16 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FLQS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLQS has been closely correlated with PATK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLQS jumps, then PATK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLQS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLQS | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| PATK - FLQS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| JXN - FLQS | 72% Closely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| CVLG - FLQS | 68% Closely correlated | -2.99% | ||
| ACT - FLQS | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| GNTY - FLQS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.93% | ||
More | ||||
PATK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PATK has been loosely correlated with ETD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PATK jumps, then ETD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PATK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PATK | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| ETD - PATK | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| AMWD - PATK | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| LZB - PATK | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| MBC - PATK | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.43% | ||
| MHK - PATK | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.36% | ||
More | ||||