Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLQM vs XMHQ
FLQM vs XMHQ Comparison
Open Charts FLQM vs XMHQ
Franklin US Mid Cap Mltfctr Idx ETF
Price$57.25
Change+$1.16 (+2.07%)
Volume$203.45K
Net Assets1.79B
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Price$106.42
Change+$2.10 (+2.01%)
Volume$479.19K
Net Assets5.28B
FLQM vs XMHQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLQM vs. XMHQ commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLQM is a Hold and XMHQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XMHQ has more net assets: 5.29B vs. FLQM (1.79B). XMHQ has a higher annual dividend yield than FLQM: XMHQ (3.905) vs FLQM (1.760). FLQM was incepted earlier than XMHQ: FLQM (9 years) vs XMHQ (19 years). XMHQ (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than FLQM (0.30). XMHQ has a higher turnover FLQM (19.00) vs FLQM (19.00).
| FLQM | XMHQ | FLQM / XMHQ | |
| Gain YTD | 1.760 | 3.905 | 45% |
| Net Assets | 1.79B | 5.29B | 34% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.25 | 120% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 58.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 1.47 | 0.62 | 237% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLQM | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 83% | 14 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FLQM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLQM has been closely correlated with GGG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLQM jumps, then GGG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLQM | 100% | -0.52% | ||
| GGG - FLQM | 83% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| NDSN - FLQM | 81% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| TROW - FLQM | 80% Closely correlated | -3.74% | ||
| CPAY - FLQM | 80% Closely correlated | -4.15% | ||
| DOV - FLQM | 78% Closely correlated | +2.09% | ||
More | ||||
XMHQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XMHQ has been closely correlated with AIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XMHQ jumps, then AIT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMHQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMHQ | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| AIT - XMHQ | 80% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| SEIC - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | -5.14% | ||
| GGG - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| VNT - XMHQ | 78% Closely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| DCI - XMHQ | 77% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
More | ||||