Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPSX vs NMVZX
FLPSX vs NMVZX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs NMVZX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$41.68
Change+$0.33 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.02B
Nuance Mid Cap Value Z
Price$12.21
Change+$0.10 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets433.11M
FLPSX vs NMVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. NMVZX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a Buy and NMVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. NMVZX (433M). NMVZX pays higher dividends than FLPSX: NMVZX (2.71) vs FLPSX (1.66). FLPSX was incepted earlier than NMVZX: FLPSX (36 years) vs NMVZX (8 years). FLPSX (0.89) is less costly to investors than NMVZX (0.84). NMVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FLPSX (23.00). FLPSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMVZX: FLPSX (0) vs NMVZX (2500). FLPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.15 vs. NMVZX (-8.51). NMVZX return over 5 years is better than : 9.58 vs. FLPSX (7.56).
| FLPSX | NMVZX | FLPSX / NMVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.79 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.84 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.750 | 0.792 | 474% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24B | 433M | 5,543% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 2.71 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.15 | -8.51 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.03 | 10.69 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.56 | 9.58 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers