Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLPSX vs LMCQX
FLPSX vs LMCQX Comparison
Open Charts FLPSX vs LMCQX
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
Price$41.68
Change+$0.33 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.02B
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R2
Price$33.22
Change+$0.34 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
FLPSX vs LMCQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLPSX vs. LMCQX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLPSX is a Buy and LMCQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLPSX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. LMCQX (1.13B). FLPSX pays higher dividends than LMCQX: FLPSX (1.66) vs LMCQX (0.24). FLPSX was incepted earlier than LMCQX: FLPSX (36 years) vs LMCQX (18 years). LMCQX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FLPSX (0.89). LMCQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. FLPSX (23.00). FLPSX (0) and LMCQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FLPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.15 vs. LMCQX (-8.40). LMCQX return over 5 years is better than : 46.02 vs. FLPSX (7.56).
| FLPSX | LMCQX | FLPSX / LMCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.38 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.38 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.750 | 0.514 | 729% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24B | 1.13B | 2,130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 0.24 | 704% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.15 | -8.40 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.03 | 27.89 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.56 | 46.02 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.65 | 45.66 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement